GeForce GTX 770M SLI vs Quadro M2200

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M2200 with GeForce GTX 770M SLI, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M2200
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
9.52

GTX 770M SLI outperforms M2200 by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking435403
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.675.81
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGM206no data
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date11 January 2017 (8 years ago)30 May 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241920
Core clock speed695 MHz811 MHz
Boost clock speed1036 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,940 million2x 2540 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate66.30no data
Floating-point processing power2.122 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs64no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2x 3 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2x 192 Bit
Memory clock speed1377 MHz4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth88 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus++
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1211
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA5.2+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro M2200 9.52
GTX 770M SLI 11.03
+15.9%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro M2200 7372
GTX 770M SLI 9569
+29.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD43
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%
4K14
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
−17.9%
65−70
+17.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−19%
24−27
+19%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−13%
50−55
+13%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
−17.9%
65−70
+17.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−19%
24−27
+19%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−17.1%
40−45
+17.1%
Fortnite 60−65
−14.8%
70−75
+14.8%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−13.3%
50−55
+13.3%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
−18.8%
35−40
+18.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−16.2%
40−45
+16.2%
Valorant 95−100
−10.4%
100−110
+10.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−13%
50−55
+13%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
−17.9%
65−70
+17.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
−11.8%
170−180
+11.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−19%
24−27
+19%
Dota 2 70−75
−11%
80−85
+11%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−17.1%
40−45
+17.1%
Fortnite 60−65
−14.8%
70−75
+14.8%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−13.3%
50−55
+13.3%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
−18.8%
35−40
+18.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−17.9%
45−50
+17.9%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−16.2%
40−45
+16.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+15.6%
30−35
−15.6%
Valorant 95−100
−10.4%
100−110
+10.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−13%
50−55
+13%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−19%
24−27
+19%
Dota 2 70−75
−11%
80−85
+11%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−17.1%
40−45
+17.1%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−13.3%
50−55
+13.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−16.2%
40−45
+16.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−60%
30−35
+60%
Valorant 95−100
−10.4%
100−110
+10.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60−65
−14.8%
70−75
+14.8%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−15.8%
21−24
+15.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
−13.9%
90−95
+13.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−59.6%
90−95
+59.6%
Valorant 110−120
−13.2%
120−130
+13.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−23.1%
30−35
+23.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−18.2%
24−27
+18.2%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−16%
27−30
+16%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−18.8%
18−20
+18.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
−18.2%
24−27
+18.2%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−9.5%
21−24
+9.5%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−15.4%
14−16
+15.4%
Valorant 55−60
−16.4%
60−65
+16.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
−13.2%
40−45
+13.2%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%

This is how Quadro M2200 and GTX 770M SLI compete in popular games:

  • GTX 770M SLI is 5% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 770M SLI is 14% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro M2200 is 16% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 770M SLI is 75% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro M2200 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • GTX 770M SLI is ahead in 61 test (97%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.52 11.03
Recency 11 January 2017 30 May 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 150 Watt

Quadro M2200 has an age advantage of 3 years, and 172.7% lower power consumption.

GTX 770M SLI, on the other hand, has a 15.9% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GTX 770M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M2200 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 770M SLI is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Quadro M2200
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M SLI
GeForce GTX 770M SLI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 383 votes

Rate Quadro M2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 770M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M2200 or GeForce GTX 770M SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.