GeForce GT 610 vs Quadro M2200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M2200 with GeForce GT 610, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M2200
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
10.98
+1239%

M2200 outperforms GT 610 by a whopping 1239% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4321152
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.01
Power efficiency13.771.95
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGM206GF119
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date11 January 2017 (8 years ago)2 April 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$39.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102448
Core clock speed695 MHz810 MHz
Boost clock speed1036 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,940 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt29 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data102 °C
Texture fill rate66.306.480
Floating-point processing power2.122 TFLOPS0.1555 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Heightno data2.7" (6.9 cm)
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1024 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1377 MHz1.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth88 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Display Port1.2no data
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray-+
Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.54.2
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.2+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro M2200 10.98
+1239%
GT 610 0.82

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M2200 4244
+1239%
GT 610 317

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro M2200 5850
+1481%
GT 610 370

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro M2200 13196
+930%
GT 610 1281

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD43
+1333%
3−4
−1333%
4K14
+1300%
1−2
−1300%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data13.33
4Kno data39.99

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+1400%
3−4
−1400%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
Fortnite 60−65
+1425%
4−5
−1425%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+1400%
3−4
−1400%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+1250%
2−3
−1250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+1750%
2−3
−1750%
Valorant 95−100
+1271%
7−8
−1271%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+1400%
3−4
−1400%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
+1440%
10−11
−1440%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Dota 2 70−75
+1360%
5−6
−1360%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
Fortnite 60−65
+1425%
4−5
−1425%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+1400%
3−4
−1400%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+1250%
2−3
−1250%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+1850%
2−3
−1850%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+1750%
2−3
−1750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+1750%
2−3
−1750%
Valorant 95−100
+1271%
7−8
−1271%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+1400%
3−4
−1400%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Dota 2 70−75
+1360%
5−6
−1360%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+1400%
3−4
−1400%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+1250%
2−3
−1250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+1750%
2−3
−1750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Valorant 95−100
+1271%
7−8
−1271%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60−65
+1425%
4−5
−1425%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
+1480%
5−6
−1480%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Metro Exodus 12−14 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+1600%
3−4
−1600%
Valorant 110−120
+1325%
8−9
−1325%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Far Cry 5 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 9−10 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Metro Exodus 6−7 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13 0−1
Valorant 55−60
+1275%
4−5
−1275%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 35−40
+1800%
2−3
−1800%
Far Cry 5 10−12 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11 0−1

This is how Quadro M2200 and GT 610 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro M2200 is 1333% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro M2200 is 1300% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.98 0.82
Recency 11 January 2017 2 April 2012
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1024 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 29 Watt

Quadro M2200 has a 1239% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

GT 610, on the other hand, has 89.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro M2200 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 610 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M2200 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GT 610 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Quadro M2200
NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
GeForce GT 610

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 380 votes

Rate Quadro M2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 2105 votes

Rate GeForce GT 610 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M2200 or GeForce GT 610, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.