GMA 3150 vs Quadro M2200

#ad 
Buy Quadro M2200
Quadro M1000M Quadro M1200 Quadro M2000M Quadro M2200 Quadro M3000M Quadro M4000M Quadro M5000M Quadro M5500
VS
#ad 
Buy GMA 3150
GMA 3000 GMA 3100 GMA 3150 GMA 3600 GMA 3650

Contents

Share:
Quadro M2200 Quadro M2200
GMA 3150 GMA 3150

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4421547
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.77no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameGM206Pineview
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date11 January 2017 (8 years ago)9 May 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102416
Core clock speed695 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1036 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,940 million123 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate66.300.8
Floating-point processing power2.122 TFLOPS0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPs321
TMUs642

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCI
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1377 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth88 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX129.0c
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.52.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.2-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M2200 4273
+213550%
GMA 3150 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD43no data
4K14no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 55−60 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50 no data
Counter-Strike 2 55−60 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data
Far Cry 5 35−40 no data
Fortnite 60−65 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 no data
Valorant 95−100 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50 no data
Counter-Strike 2 55−60 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data
Dota 2 70−75 no data
Far Cry 5 35−40 no data
Fortnite 60−65 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20 no data
Metro Exodus 21−24 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37 no data
Valorant 95−100 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data
Dota 2 70−75 no data
Far Cry 5 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20 no data
Valorant 95−100 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60−65 no data

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Metro Exodus 12−14 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24 no data

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 no data
Metro Exodus 6−7 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13 no data
Valorant 55−60 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14 no data
Counter-Strike 2 4−5 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Dota 2 35−40 no data
Far Cry 5 10−11 no data
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11 no data

Pros & cons summary

Recency 11 January 2017 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 13 Watt

Quadro M2200 has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 3150, on the other hand, has 323.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro M2200 and GMA 3150. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro M2200 is a mobile workstation card while GMA 3150 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Quadro M2200
Intel GMA 3150
GMA 3150
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro M2200 Quadro M2200
vs
Quadro P1000 Quadro P1000
GMA 3150 GMA 3150
vs
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
Quadro M2200 Quadro M2200
vs
Pro WX Vega M GL Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Quadro M2200 NVIDIA Quadro M2200
vs
R7 240 R7 240
Quadro M2200 NVIDIA Quadro M2200
vs
HD 6670 HD 6670
Quadro M2200 NVIDIA Quadro M2200
vs
HD 6670A HD 6670A
Quadro M2200 NVIDIA Quadro M2200
vs
GeForce 210 GeForce 210
Quadro M2200 NVIDIA Quadro M2200
vs
210 PCI GeForce 210 PCI
HD 6970 AMD Radeon HD 6970
vs
GT 620 OEM GT 620 OEM
HD 6970 AMD Radeon HD 6970
vs
HD 6970M Mac Edition HD 6970M Mac Edition
HD 6970 AMD Radeon HD 6970
vs
RTX 5070 RTX 5070
GTX 765M SLI NVIDIA GTX 765M SLI
vs
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB 1050 Mobile 3 GB
GTX 765M SLI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
vs
Radeon 660M Radeon 660M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 389 votes

Rate Quadro M2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 156 votes

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M2200 or GMA 3150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.