Quadro M2000M vs Radeon HD 7790

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
HD 7720 OEM HD 7730 HD 7750 HD 7770 HD 7790 HD 8770 OEM R7 260 R7 260X R9 260 OEM
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K2200M M600M M620 M1000M M1200 M2000M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7790 with Quadro M2000M, including specs and performance data.

HD 7790
2013, $149
1 GB GDDR5, 85 Watt
7.42

M2000M outperforms HD 7790 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
HD 7790 HD 7790
M2000M M2000M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking594567
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.78no data
Power efficiency6.7511.44
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameBonaireGM107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date22 March 2013 (13 years ago)3 December 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896640
Core clock speed1000 MHz1029 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1098 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate56.0043.92
Floating-point processing power1.792 TFLOPS1.405 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs5640
L1 Cache224 KB320 KB
L2 Cache256 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length183 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDA-5.0

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 7790 7.42
M2000M 8.13
+9.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7790 3090
Samples: 2143
M2000M 3387
+9.6%
Samples: 1646

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 7790 4330
+4.2%
M2000M 4157

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−20%
36
+20%
4K10−12
−10%
11
+10%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.97no data
4K14.90no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Palworld 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Palworld 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30
+0%
30
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Palworld 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
+0%
23
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+0%
14
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Palworld 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Palworld 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Palworld 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
+0%
9
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Palworld 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how HD 7790 and M2000M compete in popular games:

  • M2000M is 20% faster in 1080p
  • M2000M is 10% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.42 8.13
Recency 22 March 2013 3 December 2015
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 55 Watt

M2000M has a 10% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 55% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon HD 7790 and Quadro M2000M.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7790 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro M2000M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

HD 7790 Radeon HD 7790
vs
GTX 560 Ti GeForce GTX 560 Ti
M2000M Quadro M2000M
vs
Quadro P600 Quadro P600
HD 7790 Radeon HD 7790
vs
HD 6990 Radeon HD 6990
R7 260X AMD Radeon R7 260X
vs
HD 6870 1600SP Edition HD 6870 1600SP Edition
R7 260X AMD Radeon R7 260X
vs
FirePro W5000 FirePro W5000
R7 260X AMD Radeon R7 260X
vs
GTX 260 GTX 260
HD 8570 OEM Rebrand AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM Rebrand
vs
Radeon 780M Radeon 780M
HD 7730 AMD Radeon HD 7730
vs
HD 6570 HD 6570
HD 7790 AMD Radeon HD 7790
vs
HD 8550 OEM HD 8550 OEM
HD 7790 AMD Radeon HD 7790
vs
HD 8570 OEM HD 8570 OEM
HD 7790 AMD Radeon HD 7790
vs
RTX 3050 8 GB RTX 3050 8 GB
HD 7790 AMD Radeon HD 7790
vs
RTX 4070 SUPER RTX 4070 SUPER
HD 7570 OEM AMD Radeon HD 7570 OEM
vs
HD 7970 GHz Edition HD 7970 GHz Edition

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 275 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7790 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 574 votes

Rate Quadro M2000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7790 or Quadro M2000M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.