Radeon RX 7900 XT vs Quadro M2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M2000 with Radeon RX 7900 XT, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M2000
2016
4 GB 128-bit, 75 Watt
10.38

RX 7900 XT outperforms M2000 by a whopping 625% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking44212
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.8937.81
Power efficiency9.5417.30
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGM206Navi 31
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date8 April 2016 (8 years ago)3 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$437.75 $899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7900 XT has 872% better value for money than Quadro M2000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7685376
Core clock speed796 MHz1387 MHz
Boost clock speed1163 MHz2394 MHz
Number of transistors2,940 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate55.82804.4
Floating-point processing power1.786 TFLOPS51.48 TFLOPS
ROPs32192
TMUs48336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length201 mm276 mm
Width1" (2.5 cm)2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type128 BitGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB20 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed1653 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 106 GB/s800.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.2-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M2000 10.38
RX 7900 XT 75.24
+625%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M2000 3989
RX 7900 XT 28919
+625%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro M2000 14588
RX 7900 XT 186399
+1178%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27−30
−659%
205
+659%
1440p18−20
−644%
134
+644%
4K12−14
−633%
88
+633%

Cost per frame, $

1080p16.21
−270%
4.39
+270%
1440p24.32
−262%
6.71
+262%
4K36.48
−257%
10.22
+257%
  • RX 7900 XT has 270% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 7900 XT has 262% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 7900 XT has 257% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 237
+0%
237
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190
+0%
190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 106
+0%
106
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 580
+0%
580
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Metro Exodus 163
+0%
163
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 186
+0%
186
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95
+0%
95
+0%
Dota 2 181
+0%
181
+0%
Far Cry 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 492
+0%
492
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 173
+0%
173
+0%
Metro Exodus 161
+0%
161
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 168
+0%
168
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 89
+0%
89
+0%
Dota 2 184
+0%
184
+0%
Far Cry 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 424
+0%
424
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Valorant 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 159
+0%
159
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 159
+0%
159
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
World of Tanks 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 124
+0%
124
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
+0%
61
+0%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 325
+0%
325
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 141
+0%
141
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50
+0%
50
+0%
Dota 2 175
+0%
175
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 175
+0%
175
+0%
Metro Exodus 87
+0%
87
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 175
+0%
175
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%
Dota 2 153
+0%
153
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 173
+0%
173
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

This is how Quadro M2000 and RX 7900 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7900 XT is 659% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7900 XT is 644% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7900 XT is 633% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.38 75.24
Recency 8 April 2016 3 November 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 300 Watt

Quadro M2000 has 300% lower power consumption.

RX 7900 XT, on the other hand, has a 624.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M2000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7900 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M2000
Quadro M2000
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Radeon RX 7900 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 216 votes

Rate Quadro M2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1869 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.