Radeon 680M vs Quadro M2000

Place in performance ranking	407	294
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.28	no data
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)	RDNA 2 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GM206	RDNA 2 Rembrandt
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	8 April 2016 (8 years ago)	4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$437.75	no data
Current price	$285 (0.7x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	768
Core clock speed	796 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1163 MHz	2400 MHz
Number of transistors	2,940 million	13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	45 Watt
Texture fill rate	55.82	115.2
Floating-point performance	1,812 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M2000 and Radeon 680M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	201 mm	no data
Width	1" (2.5 cm)	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	128 Bit	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	6612 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	Up to 106 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DP DP DP DP	No outputs
Number of simultaneous displays	4	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Desktop Management	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	+	1.2
CUDA	5.2	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M2000 10.32

Radeon 680M 17.37
+68.3%

Radeon 680M outperforms Quadro M2000 by 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro M2000 3984

Radeon 680M 6166
+54.8%

Radeon 680M outperforms Quadro M2000 by 55% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	21−24 −81%	38 +81%
1440p	10−12 −80%	18 +80%
4K	5−6 −80%	9 +80%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

21−24

−85.7%

39
+85.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −94.4%	35−40 +94.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −81%	38 +81%
Battlefield 5	30−33 −90%	55−60 +90%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −94.4%	35−40 +94.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −81.3%	29 +81.3%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −70.8%	40−45 +70.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −74.1%	45−50 +74.1%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −80%	80−85 +80%
Hitman 3	18−20 −77.8%	32 +77.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −75.6%	79 +75.6%
Metro Exodus	30−33 −93.3%	55−60 +93.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −77.8%	45−50 +77.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 −86.7%	56 +86.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −85.7%	39 +85.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −94.4%	35−40 +94.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −72.2%	31 +72.2%
Battlefield 5	30−33 −90%	55−60 +90%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −94.4%	35−40 +94.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −75%	21 +75%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −70.8%	40−45 +70.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −74.1%	45−50 +74.1%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −80%	80−85 +80%
Hitman 3	8−9 −87.5%	15 +87.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −72.5%	65−70 +72.5%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −80%	18 +80%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −77.8%	45−50 +77.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −74.1%	47 +74.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −90.5%	40 +90.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −80%	50−55 +80%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −94.4%	35−40 +94.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −68.8%	27 +68.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −94.4%	35−40 +94.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −70%	17 +70%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −70.8%	40−45 +70.8%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −80%	80−85 +80%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −79.2%	43 +79.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −90.5%	40 +90.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −71.4%	24 +71.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 −80%	18 +80%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30

−77.8%

45−50
+77.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −83.3%	30−35 +83.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −83.3%	30−35 +83.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −80%	18−20 +80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −87.5%	14−16 +87.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −83.3%	21−24 +83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −83.3%	11 +83.3%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −75%	21 +75%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −88.9%	30−35 +88.9%
Hitman 3	12−14 −75%	21−24 +75%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −94.4%	35−40 +94.4%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −77.8%	30−35 +77.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −68.8%	27 +68.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −70%	17 +70%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −83.3%	10−12 +83.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

−81.3%

27−30
+81.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −70%	16−18 +70%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −85.7%	12−14 +85.7%
Hitman 3	7−8 −85.7%	12−14 +85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −90%	18−20 +90%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −83.3%	10−12 +83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −85.7%	13 +85.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −100%	4 +100%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −71.4%	24−27 +71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −90%	18−20 +90%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −77.8%	16−18 +77.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%