RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile vs Quadro M2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M2000 M3000 SE M4000 M5000 M5000 SE M6000 M6000 24 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile PRO 1000 Blackwell Mobile PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile PRO 4000 Blackwell Mobile PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M2000 with RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M2000
2016
4 GB 128-bit, 75 Watt
9.10

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile outperforms M2000 by a whopping 269% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking492158
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.49no data
Power efficiency9.8060.26
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGM206GB206
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date8 April 2016 (9 years ago)19 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$437.75 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7683328
Core clock speed796 MHz952 MHz
Boost clock speed1163 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors2,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate55.82151.3
Floating-point processing power1.786 TFLOPS9.684 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs48104
Tensor Coresno data104
Ray Tracing Coresno data26
L1 Cache288 KB3.3 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length201 mmno data
Width1" (2.5 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type128 BitGDDR7
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1653 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 106 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
Number of simultaneous displays4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.4
CUDA5.212.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
−271%
130
+271%
1440p18−20
−283%
69
+283%

Cost per frame, $

1080p12.51no data
1440p24.32no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 145
+0%
145
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 88
+0%
88
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how Quadro M2000 and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is 271% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is 283% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.10 33.59
Recency 8 April 2016 19 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 45 Watt

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile has a 269.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M2000 is a workstation graphics card while RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro M2000
Quadro M2000
NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
vs
Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
vs
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
vs
FirePro D500 FirePro D500
GTX 560 GTX 560
vs
Quadro M2000 M2000
GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
vs
Quadro M2000 M2000
RTX 2080 RTX 2080
vs
Quadro M2000 M2000
RTX 3060 8 GB GA104 RTX 3060 8 GB GA104
vs
Quadro M2000 M2000
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Mobile
vs
Quadro M2000 M2000
FX 5700 LE FX 5700 LE
vs
Tesla M4 Tesla M4
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
vs
Tesla M4 Tesla M4
RTX 4000 Ada Generation RTX 4000 Ada Generation
vs
Tesla M40 Tesla M40
Tesla T40 24 GB Tesla T40 24 GB
vs
NVS 810 NVS 810
A100 PCIe 40 GB A100 PCIe 40 GB
vs
Tesla M60 Tesla M60

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 229 votes

Rate Quadro M2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M2000 or RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.