GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile vs Quadro M2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M2000 with GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M2000
2016
4 GB 128-bit, 75 Watt
10.32

RTX 2080 Super Mobile outperforms Quadro M2000 by a whopping 277% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking407106
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.3115.45
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameGM206N18E-G3 TU104
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date8 April 2016 (8 years ago)2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$437.75 no data
Current price$285 (0.7x MSRP)$1671

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2080 Super Mobile has 258% better value for money than Quadro M2000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7683072
Core clock speed796 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speed1163 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors2,940 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate55.82299.5
Floating-point performance1,812 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M2000 and GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length201 mmno data
Width1" (2.5 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type128 BitGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed6612 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 106 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP DP DP DPNo outputs
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
G-SYNC supportno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
VR Readyno data+
nView Desktop Management+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model56.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.140
CUDA5.27.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
−306%
142
+306%
1440p24−27
−300%
96
+300%
4K16−18
−306%
65
+306%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−278%
65−70
+278%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−308%
98
+308%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−319%
65−70
+319%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−317%
120−130
+317%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−304%
109
+304%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−278%
65−70
+278%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−311%
144
+311%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−293%
157
+293%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−323%
140−150
+323%
Hitman 3 21−24
−281%
80−85
+281%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−292%
235
+292%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−311%
144
+311%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
−303%
121
+303%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75
−279%
265
+279%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−300%
95−100
+300%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−305%
85
+305%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−319%
65−70
+319%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−317%
120−130
+317%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−313%
99
+313%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−278%
65−70
+278%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−296%
107
+296%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
−290%
117
+290%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−323%
140−150
+323%
Hitman 3 21−24
−281%
80−85
+281%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−293%
150−160
+293%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−330%
129
+330%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
−290%
117
+290%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−295%
217
+295%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−296%
198
+296%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
−297%
278
+297%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−288%
62
+288%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−319%
65−70
+319%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−311%
74
+311%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−278%
65−70
+278%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−317%
75
+317%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−323%
140−150
+323%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−285%
154
+285%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−307%
183
+307%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−281%
103
+281%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−300%
95−100
+300%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−296%
107
+296%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−317%
75−80
+317%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
−337%
131
+337%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−307%
57
+307%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−330%
40−45
+330%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−306%
73
+306%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−288%
30−35
+288%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−294%
70−75
+294%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−286%
80−85
+286%
Hitman 3 12−14
−317%
50−55
+317%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−303%
121
+303%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−329%
90
+329%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−291%
137
+291%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−300%
55−60
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−278%
30−35
+278%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−310%
86
+310%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−290%
35−40
+290%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−283%
46
+283%
Hitman 3 8−9
−300%
30−35
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−308%
45−50
+308%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−283%
46
+283%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−322%
76
+322%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−280%
38
+280%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−278%
34
+278%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−333%
12−14
+333%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−313%
33
+313%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−286%
50−55
+286%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−300%
72
+300%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−293%
55
+293%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−280%
18−20
+280%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−308%
49
+308%

This is how Quadro M2000 and RTX 2080 Super Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 Super Mobile is 306% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2080 Super Mobile is 300% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2080 Super Mobile is 306% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.32 38.88
Recency 8 April 2016 2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 150 Watt

The GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M2000 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M2000
Quadro M2000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 195 votes

Rate Quadro M2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 126 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.