GeForce GTS 450 vs Quadro M2000

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Quadro M2000
2016
4GB 128-bit
10.32
+203%

Quadro M2000 outperforms GeForce GTS 450 by a whopping 203% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking405692
Place by popularitynot in top-10098
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.080.31
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGM206GF106
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date8 April 2016 (8 years ago)13 September 2010 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$437.75 $129
Current price$285 (0.7x MSRP)$127 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro M2000 has 1216% better value for money than GTS 450.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768192
CUDA coresno data192
Core clock speed796 MHz783 MHz
Boost clock speed1163 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,940 million1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt106 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data100 °C
Texture fill rate55.8225.1 billion/sec
Floating-point performance1,812 gflops601.3 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0 x 16
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length201 mm8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm)
Heightno data4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Width1" (2.5 cm)2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone6-pin
SLI optionsno data+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type128 BitGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed6612 MHz1804 (3608 data rate) MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 106 GB/s57.7 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP DP DP DPMini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
HDMIno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (11_0)
Shader Model55.1
OpenGL4.54.2
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA5.2+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M2000 10.32
+203%
GTS 450 3.41

Quadro M2000 outperforms GeForce GTS 450 by 203% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro M2000 3995
+203%
GTS 450 1320

Quadro M2000 outperforms GeForce GTS 450 by 203% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Quadro M2000 14046
+185%
GTS 450 4924

Quadro M2000 outperforms GeForce GTS 450 by 185% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

Quadro M2000 34
+127%
GTS 450 15

Quadro M2000 outperforms GeForce GTS 450 by 127% in Octane Render OctaneBench.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p80−85
+186%
28
−186%
Full HD110−120
+189%
38
−189%
1200p80−85
+196%
27
−196%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.32 3.41
Recency 8 April 2016 13 September 2010
Cost $437.75 $129
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 106 Watt

The Quadro M2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTS 450 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M2000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTS 450 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M2000
Quadro M2000
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
GeForce GTS 450

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 194 votes

Rate Quadro M2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 2478 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.