T1000 8 GB vs Quadro M1000M

Place in performance ranking	501	265
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.88	6.69
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	GM107	TU117
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	2 October 2015 (8 years ago)	6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$200.89	no data
Current price	$706 (3.5x MSRP)	$690

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

T1000 8 GB has 660% better value for money than M1000M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	896
Core clock speed	993 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1072 MHz	1395 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	31.78	78.12
Floating-point performance	1,017 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M1000M and T1000 8 GB compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB/4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	10 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	4x mini-DisplayPort
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.6
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	+	1.2
CUDA	5.0	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M1000M 7.43

T1000 8 GB 19.71
+165%

T1000 8 GB outperforms Quadro M1000M by 165% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

M1000M 2868

T1000 8 GB 7611
+165%

T1000 8 GB outperforms Quadro M1000M by 165% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	36 −164%	95−100 +164%
4K	12 −150%	30−35 +150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

12−14

−150%

30−33
+150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −133%	21−24 +133%
Battlefield 5	21−24 −150%	55−60 +150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −165%	45−50 +165%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −162%	55−60 +162%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −164%	95−100 +164%
Hitman 3	14−16 −150%	35−40 +150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −158%	85−90 +158%
Metro Exodus	20−22 −150%	50−55 +150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −162%	55−60 +162%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −150%	60−65 +150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −159%	75−80 +159%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −133%	21−24 +133%
Battlefield 5	21−24 −150%	55−60 +150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −165%	45−50 +165%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −162%	55−60 +162%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −164%	95−100 +164%
Hitman 3	14−16 −150%	35−40 +150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −158%	85−90 +158%
Metro Exodus	20−22 −150%	50−55 +150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −162%	55−60 +162%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −150%	60−65 +150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	19 −163%	50−55 +163%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −159%	75−80 +159%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −133%	21−24 +133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −165%	45−50 +165%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −164%	95−100 +164%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −158%	85−90 +158%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −150%	60−65 +150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	11 −145%	27−30 +145%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −159%	75−80 +159%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

−162%

55−60
+162%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −150%	35−40 +150%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 −145%	27−30 +145%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −133%	21−24 +133%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −145%	27−30 +145%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −131%	30−33 +131%
Hitman 3	10−12 −145%	27−30 +145%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −150%	40−45 +150%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −133%	14−16 +133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

−131%

30−33
+131%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −133%	14−16 +133%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Hitman 3	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7 −157%	18−20 +157%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8
−157%

18−20

+157%

This is how M1000M and T1000 8 GB compete in popular games:

T1000 8 GB is 164% faster in 1080p
T1000 8 GB is 150% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.43	19.71
Recency	2 October 2015	6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB/4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	50 Watt