Radeon R5 M335 vs Quadro M1000M

Place in performance ranking	502	956
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.88	0.02
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code name	GM107	Exo XT DDR3
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	2 October 2015 (8 years ago)	16 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$200.89	no data
Current price	$706 (3.5x MSRP)	$891

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

M1000M has 4300% better value for money than R5 M335.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	320
Compute units	no data	5
Core clock speed	993 MHz	1070 MHz
Boost clock speed	1072 MHz	1070 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	690 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	unknown
Texture fill rate	31.78	21.40
Floating-point performance	1,017 gflops	684.8 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M1000M and Radeon R5 M335 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	no data	PCIe 3.0
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB/4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	1100 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	no data	-
Enduro	no data	-
HD3D	no data	+
PowerTune	no data	+
DualGraphics	no data	1
TrueAudio	no data	-
ZeroCore	no data	+
Switchable graphics	no data	1
Optimus	+	no data
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	DirectX® 12
Shader Model	5.0	5.0
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	Not Listed
Vulkan	+	+
Mantle	no data	+
CUDA	5.0	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M1000M 7.42
+423%

R5 M335 1.42

Quadro M1000M outperforms Radeon R5 M335 by 423% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

M1000M 2867
+423%

R5 M335 548

Quadro M1000M outperforms Radeon R5 M335 by 423% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

M1000M 4230
+137%

R5 M335 1784

Quadro M1000M outperforms Radeon R5 M335 by 137% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

M1000M 3498
+284%

R5 M335 911

Quadro M1000M outperforms Radeon R5 M335 by 284% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

M1000M 23422
+410%

R5 M335 4590

Quadro M1000M outperforms Radeon R5 M335 by 410% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	36 +200%	12 −200%
4K	12 +500%	2−3 −500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

18−20

+350%

4−5
−350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +400%	9−10 −400%
Battlefield 5	110−120 +400%	21−24 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Hitman 3	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +400%	14−16 −400%
Metro Exodus	100−105 +400%	20−22 −400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +400%	9−10 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +400%	12−14 −400%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +400%	9−10 −400%
Battlefield 5	110−120 +400%	21−24 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Hitman 3	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +400%	14−16 −400%
Metro Exodus	100−105 +400%	20−22 −400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +400%	9−10 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 +400%	6 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +400%	12−14 −400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +400%	9−10 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +400%	14−16 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +400%	9−10 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +367%	3 −367%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +400%	12−14 −400%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

+400%

2−3
−400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Hitman 3	35−40 +400%	7−8 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +380%	5−6 −380%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +400%	8−9 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +400%	6−7 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

+350%

4−5
−350%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 +400%	6−7 −400%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Hitman 3	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +400%	7 −400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +400%	8−9 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%