Radeon RX 7700 XT vs Quadro K620

#ad 
Buy
GRID M3-3020 GRID M10-8Q GRID M40 NVS 810 Quadro K620 Quadro K1200 Quadro K2200 Tesla M10
VS
#ad 
Buy
Radeon RX 7500 XT Radeon RX 7600 Radeon RX 7600 XT Radeon RX 7650 GRE Radeon RX 7700 Radeon RX 7700 XT Radeon RX 7800 XT Radeon RX 7900 GRE Radeon RX 7900 XT Radeon RX 7900 XTX Radeon RX 7950 XT Radeon RX 7950 XTX Radeon RX 7990 XTX

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K620 with Radeon RX 7700 XT, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K620
2014
2 GB 128-bit, 41 Watt
5.56

RX 7700 XT outperforms K620 by a whopping 912% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro K620 Quadro K620
RX 7700 XT RX 7700 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking61449
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.8071.67
Power efficiency8.7316.23
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameGM107Navi 32
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 July 2014 (10 years ago)25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$189.89 $449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 7700 XT has 2460% better value for money than Quadro K620.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3843456
Core clock speed1058 MHz1435 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHz2544 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)41 Watt245 Watt
Texture fill rate26.98549.5
Floating-point processing power0.8632 TFLOPS35.17 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs24216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length160 mm267 mm
Width1" (2.5 cm)2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type128 BitGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 29 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro K620 5.56
RX 7700 XT 56.24
+912%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K620 2224
RX 7700 XT 22484
+911%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−20
−928%
185
+928%
1440p10−12
−920%
102
+920%
4K5−6
−1080%
59
+1080%

Cost per frame, $

1080p10.55
−335%
2.43
+335%
1440p18.99
−331%
4.40
+331%
4K37.98
−399%
7.61
+399%
  • RX 7700 XT has 335% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 7700 XT has 331% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 7700 XT has 399% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 351
+0%
351
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 193
+0%
193
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 196
+0%
196
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 344
+0%
344
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 158
+0%
158
+0%
Far Cry 5 188
+0%
188
+0%
Fortnite 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 278
+0%
278
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 161
+0%
161
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 243
+0%
243
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 132
+0%
132
+0%
Far Cry 5 181
+0%
181
+0%
Fortnite 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 272
+0%
272
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 166
+0%
166
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 119
+0%
119
+0%
Metro Exodus 152
+0%
152
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 295
+0%
295
+0%
Valorant 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 122
+0%
122
+0%
Far Cry 5 167
+0%
167
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 231
+0%
231
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 91
+0%
91
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 168
+0%
168
+0%
Valorant 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 127
+0%
127
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 105
+0%
105
+0%
Metro Exodus 90
+0%
90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80
+0%
80
+0%
Far Cry 5 157
+0%
157
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 197
+0%
197
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 67
+0%
67
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120
+0%
120
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 31
+0%
31
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 112
+0%
112
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 57
+0%
57
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 89
+0%
89
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
+0%
36
+0%
Far Cry 5 82
+0%
82
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 134
+0%
134
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 36
+0%
36
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how Quadro K620 and RX 7700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7700 XT is 928% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7700 XT is 920% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7700 XT is 1080% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 5.56 56.24
Recency 22 July 2014 25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 41 Watt 245 Watt

Quadro K620 has 497.6% lower power consumption.

RX 7700 XT, on the other hand, has a 911.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K620 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K620 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7700 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K620
Quadro K620
AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
Radeon RX 7700 XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K620 Quadro K620
vs
FirePro V7900 FirePro V7900
RX 7700 XT Radeon RX 7700 XT
vs
RX 7700 Radeon RX 7700
Quadro K620 Quadro K620
vs
P106-090 P106 090
Quadro K4200 K4200
vs
P104-101 P104 101
Quadro K620 K620
vs
GT 650M GT 650M
Quadro K620 K620
vs
GT 650M SLI GT 650M SLI
Quadro K620 K620
vs
GTX 470M GTX 470M
Quadro K620 K620
vs
GT 650M Mac Edition GT 650M Mac Edition
Tesla K40s Tesla K40s
vs
RTX 5000 RTX 5000
Tesla K40st Tesla K40st
vs
RTX A6000 RTX A6000
Tesla K40c Tesla K40c
vs
GTX 760 GTX 760
GRID K340 GRID K340
vs
RTX A4500 Mobile RTX A4500 Mobile
GRID K520 GRID K520
vs
Tesla M10 Tesla M10

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 674 votes

Rate Quadro K620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1994 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K620 or Radeon RX 7700 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.