Quadro FX 770M vs K620

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking560not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation1.21no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)G9x (2007−2010)
GPU code nameGM107NB9P-GLM
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date22 July 2014 (9 years ago)14 August 2008 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$189.89 $527
Current price$286 (1.5x MSRP)$387 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38432
Core clock speed1058 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)41 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate26.988.000
Floating-point performance863.2 gflops80 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Quadro K620 and Quadro FX 770M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-II
Length160 mmno data
Width1" (2.5 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory type128 BitGDDR2 / GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 29 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDVI-I DPNo outputs
Number of simultaneous displays4no data

Supported Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1211.1 (10_0)
Shader Model54.0
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA5.01.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro K620 2233
+1214%
FX 770M 170

K620 outperforms FX 770M by 1214% in Passmark.

Pros & Cons Summary


Recency 22 July 2014 14 August 2008
Cost $189.89 $527
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 41 Watt 35 Watt

We couldn't decide between Quadro K620 and Quadro FX 770M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K620 is a workstation card while Quadro FX 770M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K620
Quadro K620
NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
Quadro FX 770M

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 552 votes

Rate Quadro K620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 31 vote

Rate Quadro FX 770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.