Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Quadro K610M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K610M with Radeon RX 5700 XT, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K610M
2013
1 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
1.86

RX 5700 XT outperforms K610M by a whopping 2209% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking91488
Place by popularitynot in top-10056
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.2147.16
Power efficiency4.2813.17
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGK208Navi 10
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date23 July 2013 (11 years ago)7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229.99 $399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5700 XT has 22357% better value for money than Quadro K610M.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1922560
Core clock speed980 MHz1605 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1905 MHz
Number of transistors915 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate15.68304.8
Floating-point processing power0.3763 TFLOPS9.754 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs16160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data272 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed650 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth20.8 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
VR Readyno data+
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data
Multi Monitorno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan++
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K610M 1.86
RX 5700 XT 42.94
+2209%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K610M 718
RX 5700 XT 16550
+2205%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro K610M 1144
RX 5700 XT 35823
+3033%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro K610M 5116
RX 5700 XT 83961
+1541%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro K610M 756
RX 5700 XT 26189
+3366%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro K610M 5838
RX 5700 XT 146093
+2403%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD11
−1036%
125
+1036%
1440p3−4
−2433%
76
+2433%
4K1−2
−4400%
45
+4400%

Cost per frame, $

1080p20.913.19
1440p76.665.25
4K229.998.87

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1850%
78
+1850%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−986%
76
+986%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−19800%
199
+19800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−2260%
118
+2260%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1850%
78
+1850%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−4067%
125
+4067%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−2260%
118
+2260%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−4157%
298
+4157%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1300%
84
+1300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−1741%
313
+1741%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2775%
115
+2775%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−1689%
160−170
+1689%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−640%
259
+640%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−2100%
154
+2100%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−16400%
165
+16400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−2040%
107
+2040%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1775%
75
+1775%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−3267%
101
+3267%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−2060%
108
+2060%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−3943%
283
+3943%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1333%
86
+1333%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−1629%
294
+1629%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2325%
97
+2325%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−2044%
193
+2044%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−642%
85−90
+642%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−609%
248
+609%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−786%
62
+786%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1500%
80
+1500%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1575%
67
+1575%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2333%
73
+2333%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2014%
148
+2014%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1283%
83
+1283%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−694%
135
+694%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−1800%
171
+1800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−675%
93
+675%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−91.4%
67
+91.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2600%
108
+2600%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−4100%
126
+4100%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−2700%
84
+2700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−5200%
53
+5200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−5700%
58
+5700%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3900%
40
+3900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2850%
59
+2850%
Hitman 3 7−8
−743%
59
+743%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−1633%
104
+1633%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−2310%
241
+2310%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−1480%
79
+1480%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−4300%
44
+4300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1650%
35
+1650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−3200%
33
+3200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 33
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2900%
30
+2900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 13

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1233%
40
+1233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 110
+0%
110
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 91
+0%
91
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 78
+0%
78
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 59
+0%
59
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 273
+0%
273
+0%
Metro Exodus 104
+0%
104
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 119
+0%
119
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Hitman 3 45
+0%
45
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 121
+0%
121
+0%
Metro Exodus 65
+0%
65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+0%
54
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 17
+0%
17
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 79
+0%
79
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 71
+0%
71
+0%

This is how Quadro K610M and RX 5700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 5700 XT is 1036% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5700 XT is 2433% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5700 XT is 4400% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 5700 XT is 19800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 5700 XT is ahead in 53 tests (76%)
  • there's a draw in 17 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.86 42.94
Recency 23 July 2013 7 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 225 Watt

Quadro K610M has 650% lower power consumption.

RX 5700 XT, on the other hand, has a 2208.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K610M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K610M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 5700 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K610M
Quadro K610M
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 25 votes

Rate Quadro K610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7870 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.