Radeon RX 7700 XT vs Quadro K6000

Place in performance ranking	245	33
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	11.46	40.61
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	RDNA 3
GPU code name	GK110B	Navi 32
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	23 July 2013 (10 years ago)	25 August 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$5,265	$449
Current price	$429 (0.1x MSRP)	$443 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7700 XT has 254% better value for money than Quadro K6000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2880	3456
Core clock speed	797 MHz	1700 MHz
Boost clock speed	902 MHz	2544 MHz
Number of transistors	7,080 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	245 Watt
Texture fill rate	216.5	549.5
Floating-point performance	5,196 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz	18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.4 GB/s	432.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.2
Vulkan	+	1.3
CUDA	3.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K6000 20.83

RX 7700 XT 57.27
+175%

Radeon RX 7700 XT outperforms Quadro K6000 by 175% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro K6000 8052

RX 7700 XT 22139
+175%

Radeon RX 7700 XT outperforms Quadro K6000 by 175% in Passmark.