Radeon PRO V710 vs Quadro K6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking263not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.23no data
Power efficiency6.40no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGK110BNavi 32
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date23 July 2013 (11 years ago)3 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,265 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28803456
Core clock speed797 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed902 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rate216.5432.0
Floating-point processing power5.196 TFLOPS27.65 TFLOPS
ROPs4896
TMUs240216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB28 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit224 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s504.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 July 2013 3 October 2024
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 28 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 158 Watt

PRO V710 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 133.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 42.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K6000 and Radeon PRO V710. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K6000
Quadro K6000
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 108 votes

Rate Quadro K6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.