GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs Quadro K6000
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro K6000 with GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition, including specs and performance data.
K6000 outperforms 775M Mac Edition by a whopping 524% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 317 | 798 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.49 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 6.49 | 2.34 |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Kepler (2012−2018) |
| GPU code name | GK110B | GK104 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 (12 years ago) | 8 November 2013 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $5,265 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2880 | 1344 |
| Core clock speed | 797 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 902 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 7,080 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 216.5 | 89.26 |
| Floating-point processing power | 5.196 TFLOPS | 2.142 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 | 32 |
| TMUs | 240 | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 112 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1536 KB | 512 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1502 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | + | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.5 | 3.0 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 18.10 | 2.90 |
| Recency | 23 July 2013 | 8 November 2013 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 2 GB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
Quadro K6000 has a 524.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.
GTX 775M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and 125% lower power consumption.
The Quadro K6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro K6000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
