Radeon RX 7600M XT vs Quadro K600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GRID K1 GRID K100 GRID K120Q GRID K160Q GRID K340 NVS 510 NVS 1000 Quadro 410 Quadro K420 Quadro K600 Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000D
VS
Radeon RX 7600M Radeon RX 7600M XT Radeon RX 7600S Radeon RX 7700S Radeon RX 7800M Radeon RX 7900M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K600 with Radeon RX 7600M XT, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K600
2013
1 GB DDR3, 41 Watt
1.85

RX 7600M XT outperforms K600 by a whopping 1689% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro K600 Quadro K600
RX 7600M XT RX 7600M XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking917162
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.27no data
Power efficiency3.1719.36
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameGK107Navi 33
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 March 2013 (11 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1922048
Core clock speed876 MHz1280 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2469 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)41 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate14.02316.0
Floating-point processing power0.3364 TFLOPS20.23 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs16128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length160 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA3.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro K600 1.85
RX 7600M XT 33.09
+1689%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K600 729
RX 7600M XT 13022
+1686%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6−7
−1833%
116
+1833%
1440p3−4
−1700%
54
+1700%
4K1−2
−3100%
32
+3100%

Cost per frame, $

1080p33.17no data
1440p66.33no data
4K199.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 186
+0%
186
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 105
+0%
105
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 116
+0%
116
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 140
+0%
140
+0%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 96
+0%
96
+0%
Far Cry 5 127
+0%
127
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 245
+0%
245
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 85
+0%
85
+0%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 82
+0%
82
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 81
+0%
81
+0%
Dota 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 127
+0%
127
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 237
+0%
237
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 133
+0%
133
+0%
Metro Exodus 98
+0%
98
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 186
+0%
186
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60
+0%
60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 74
+0%
74
+0%
Dota 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 120
+0%
120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180
+0%
180
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 105
+0%
105
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 70
+0%
70
+0%
Metro Exodus 58
+0%
58
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 48
+0%
48
+0%
Far Cry 5 102
+0%
102
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 142
+0%
142
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76
+0%
76
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 1
+0%
1
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 74
+0%
74
+0%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 53
+0%
53
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 13
+0%
13
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+0%
22
+0%
Dota 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 51
+0%
51
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90
+0%
90
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how Quadro K600 and RX 7600M XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600M XT is 1833% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7600M XT is 1700% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7600M XT is 3100% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.85 33.09
Recency 1 March 2013 4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 41 Watt 120 Watt

Quadro K600 has 192.7% lower power consumption.

RX 7600M XT, on the other hand, has a 1688.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7600M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K600 is a workstation card while Radeon RX 7600M XT is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K600
Quadro K600
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 7600M XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K600 Quadro K600
vs
GRID K140Q GRID K140Q
RX 7600M XT Radeon RX 7600M XT
vs
RX 7800M Radeon RX 7800M
Quadro K600 Quadro K600
vs
Quadro K420 Quadro K420
Quadro K4000 Quadro K4000
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB
Quadro K600 Quadro K600
vs
GeForce 820M GeForce 820M
Quadro K600 Quadro K600
vs
7300 GS GeForce 7300 GS
Quadro K600 Quadro K600
vs
RX Vega 3 RX Vega 3
Quadro K600 Quadro K600
vs
Pro VII Pro VII
K5000 SYNC Quadro K5000 SYNC
vs
ATI 3D Rage II+ DVD Rage II+ DVD
K5000 SYNC Quadro K5000 SYNC
vs
RTX 2080 Ti 12 GB RTX 2080 Ti 12 GB
NVS 510 NVS 510
vs
GT 240M LE GT 240M LE
Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000
vs
Tesla K40d Tesla K40d
Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000
vs
RTX A2000 12 GB A2000 12 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.7 199 votes

Rate Quadro K600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 75 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K600 or Radeon RX 7600M XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.