Radeon RX 6700 XT vs Quadro K600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GRID K1 GRID K100 GRID K140Q GRID K160Q GRID K340 NVS 510 NVS 1000 Quadro 410 Quadro K420 Quadro K600 Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000D
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX 6700 Radeon RX 6700 XT Radeon RX 6750 GRE Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB Radeon RX 6750 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K600 with Radeon RX 6700 XT, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K600
2013
1 GB DDR3, 41 Watt
1.63

RX 6700 XT outperforms K600 by a whopping 2621% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro K600 Quadro K600
RX 6700 XT RX 6700 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking92360
Place by popularitynot in top-10092
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.2756.31
Power efficiency3.1415.25
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGK107Navi 22
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 March 2013 (12 years ago)3 March 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $479

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 6700 XT has 20756% better value for money than Quadro K600.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1922560
Core clock speed876 MHz2321 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2581 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)41 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate14.02413.0
Floating-point processing power0.3364 TFLOPS13.21 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs16160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length160 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan+1.2
CUDA3.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro K600 1.63
RX 6700 XT 44.35
+2621%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K600 728
RX 6700 XT 19818
+2622%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD5−6
−2880%
149
+2880%
1440p3−4
−2633%
82
+2633%
4K1−2
−4600%
47
+4600%

Cost per frame, $

1080p39.80
−1138%
3.21
+1138%
1440p66.33
−1036%
5.84
+1036%
4K199.00
−1853%
10.19
+1853%
  • RX 6700 XT has 1138% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6700 XT has 1036% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6700 XT has 1853% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 232
+0%
232
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 349
+0%
349
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 119
+0%
119
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 169
+0%
169
+0%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 347
+0%
347
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 99
+0%
99
+0%
Far Cry 5 178
+0%
178
+0%
Fortnite 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 224
+0%
224
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 101
+0%
101
+0%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 206
+0%
206
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 90
+0%
90
+0%
Dota 2 175
+0%
175
+0%
Far Cry 5 169
+0%
169
+0%
Fortnite 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 200
+0%
200
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 161
+0%
161
+0%
Metro Exodus 119
+0%
119
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 223
+0%
223
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85
+0%
85
+0%
Dota 2 139
+0%
139
+0%
Far Cry 5 159
+0%
159
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 127
+0%
127
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 126
+0%
126
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 102
+0%
102
+0%
Metro Exodus 71
+0%
71
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 56
+0%
56
+0%
Far Cry 5 137
+0%
137
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 32
+0%
32
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 102
+0%
102
+0%
Metro Exodus 43
+0%
43
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+0%
74
+0%
Valorant 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Dota 2 106
+0%
106
+0%
Far Cry 5 71
+0%
71
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

This is how Quadro K600 and RX 6700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6700 XT is 2880% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6700 XT is 2633% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6700 XT is 4600% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.63 44.35
Recency 1 March 2013 3 March 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 41 Watt 230 Watt

Quadro K600 has 461% lower power consumption.

RX 6700 XT, on the other hand, has a 2620.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K600 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6700 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K600
Quadro K600
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Radeon RX 6700 XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K600 Quadro K600
vs
GRID K140Q GRID K140Q
RX 6700 XT Radeon RX 6700 XT
vs
RTX 4060 GeForce RTX 4060
Quadro K600 Quadro K600
vs
Quadro K420 Quadro K420
Quadro K2000 K2000
vs
RX 5600M RX 5600M
Quadro K4000 K4000
vs
GeForce G210M G210M
Quadro K4000 K4000
vs
605 OEM 605 OEM
Quadro K4000 K4000
vs
210 OEM 210 OEM
Quadro K600 K600
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4200 IGP Mobility Radeon HD 4200 IGP
K5000 SYNC K5000 SYNC
vs
GTX 470 X2 GTX 470 X2
Tesla K20c Tesla K20c
vs
RTX 2070 RTX 2070
Quadro 410 410
vs
GT 530 OEM GT 530 OEM
Plex 7000 Plex 7000
vs
E9174 MXM E9174 MXM
Plex 7000 Plex 7000
vs
T2000 Mobile T2000 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.7 199 votes

Rate Quadro K600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7169 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K600 or Radeon RX 6700 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.