Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile vs Quadro K5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking393not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.96no data
Power efficiency7.57no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGK110BVega 10
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date22 July 2014 (11 years ago)1 June 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,699.74 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23043584
Core clock speed667 MHz1138 MHz
Boost clock speed771 MHz1301 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate148.0291.4
Floating-point processing power3.553 TFLOPS9.326 TFLOPS
ROPs4864
TMUs192224
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s409.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.1.125
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 July 2014 1 June 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 120 Watt

RX Vega 56 Mobile has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K5200 and Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K5200 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 52 votes

Rate Quadro K5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K5200 or Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.