GeForce GTX 750 v2 vs Quadro K5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking391not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.94no data
Power efficiency7.50no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGK110BGM206
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 July 2014 (11 years ago)17 November 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,699.74 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304512
Core clock speed667 MHz1038 MHz
Boost clock speed771 MHz1188 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data
Texture fill rate148.038.02
Floating-point processing power3.553 TFLOPS1.217 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs19232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s80.19 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+-
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 July 2014 17 November 2015
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB

Quadro K5200 has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 750 v2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K5200 and GeForce GTX 750 v2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K5200 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 750 v2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K5200
Quadro K5200
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 v2
GeForce GTX 750 v2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 51 votes

Rate Quadro K5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 67 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K5200 or GeForce GTX 750 v2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.