GeForce G 105M vs Quadro K510M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K510M with GeForce G 105M, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K510M
2013
1 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
1.63
+919%

K510M outperforms G 105M by a whopping 919% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9531427
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.820.80
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)G9x (2007−2010)
GPU code nameGK208N10M-GE1
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date23 July 2013 (11 years ago)8 January 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1928
Core clock speed846 MHz640 MHz
Number of transistors915 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate13.54no data
Floating-point processing power0.3249 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR2, GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1210
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro K510M 1.63
+919%
G 105M 0.16

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K510M 641
+934%
G 105M 62

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Battlefield 5 3−4 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Fortnite 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Valorant 35−40
+44%
24−27
−44%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Battlefield 5 3−4 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+209%
10−12
−209%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Dota 2 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Fortnite 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Valorant 35−40
+44%
24−27
−44%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Dota 2 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Valorant 35−40
+44%
24−27
−44%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Valorant 9−10 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro K510M is 1000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro K510M is ahead in 31 test (97%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.63 0.16
Recency 23 July 2013 8 January 2009
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 14 Watt

Quadro K510M has a 918.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

G 105M, on the other hand, has 114.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro K510M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce G 105M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K510M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce G 105M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K510M
Quadro K510M
NVIDIA GeForce G 105M
GeForce G 105M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 2 votes

Rate Quadro K510M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 45 votes

Rate GeForce G 105M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K510M or GeForce G 105M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.