ATI Rage Fury MAXX vs Quadro K5100M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking560not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.16no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Rage 4 (1998−1999)
GPU code nameGK104Rage 4
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date23 July 2013 (12 years ago)1 October 1999 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed771 MHz125 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate98.690.25 ×2
Floating-point processing power2.369 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322 ×2
TMUs1282 ×2
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 MB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed900 MHz143 MHz
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/s1.144 GB/s ×2
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX126.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.51.2
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 July 2013 1 October 1999
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 250 nm

K5100M has an age advantage of 13 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 792.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K5100M and Rage Fury MAXX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K5100M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Rage Fury MAXX is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
Quadro K5100M
ATI Rage Fury MAXX
Rage Fury MAXX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 64 votes

Rate Quadro K5100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 7 votes

Rate Rage Fury MAXX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K5100M or Rage Fury MAXX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.