ATI Rage Fury MAXX vs Quadro K4000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking682not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.80no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Rage 4 (1998−1999)
GPU code nameGK104Rage 4
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 June 2012 (13 years ago)1 October 1999 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores960no data
Core clock speed601 MHz125 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate48.080.25 ×2
Floating-point processing power1.154 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322 ×2
TMUs802 ×2
L1 Cache80 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 MB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed700 MHz143 MHz
Memory bandwidth89.6 GB/s1.144 GB/s ×2
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)6.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2012 1 October 1999
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 250 nm

K4000M has an age advantage of 12 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 792.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K4000M and Rage Fury MAXX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K4000M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Rage Fury MAXX is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
Quadro K4000M
ATI Rage Fury MAXX
Rage Fury MAXX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 14 votes

Rate Quadro K4000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 7 votes

Rate Rage Fury MAXX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K4000M or Rage Fury MAXX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.