UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs Quadro K500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K500M with UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K500M
2012
1 GB DDR3, 35 Watt
1.24

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs outperforms K500M by a whopping 248% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1032670
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.45no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameGK107Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date1 June 2012 (12 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19232
Core clock speed850 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate13.60no data
Floating-point processing power0.3264 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed800 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+-
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD4−5
−300%
16
+300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1300%
14
+1300%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Hitman 3 6−7
−167%
16
+167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−107%
27−30
+107%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−550%
13
+550%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−100%
16−18
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1200%
13
+1200%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Hitman 3 6−7
−100%
12
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−107%
27−30
+107%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−100%
4
+100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−100%
16−18
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−54.5%
16−18
+54.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1100%
12
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Hitman 3 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−54.5%
16−18
+54.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Hitman 3 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 2−3

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 11
+0%
11
+0%
Battlefield 5 18
+0%
18
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9
+0%
9
+0%
Battlefield 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Metro Exodus 6
+0%
6
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Battlefield 5 15
+0%
15
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hitman 3 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how Quadro K500M and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is 300% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is 1300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is ahead in 31 test (55%)
  • there's a draw in 25 tests (45%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.24 4.31
Recency 1 June 2012 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs has a 247.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K500M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K500M is a mobile workstation card while UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K500M
Quadro K500M
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro K500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.