UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs Quadro K500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K200M K1000M K1100M K2000M K2000M Embedded K2100M K3000M K3100M K4000M K4100M K5000M K5100M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 750 32EUs Xe G1 Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K500M with UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K500M
2012
1 GB DDR3, 35 Watt
1.14

Graphics 750 32EUs outperforms K500M by a whopping 243% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro K500M Quadro K500M
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1106744
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.52no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameGK107Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date1 June 2012 (13 years ago)30 March 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19232
Core clock speed850 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate13.60no data
Floating-point processing power0.3264 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs16no data
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed800 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+-
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD4−5
−300%
16
+300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 0−1 18
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−600%
14
+600%
Fortnite 2−3
−1050%
21−24
+1050%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−171%
18−20
+171%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Valorant 30−35
−68.8%
50−55
+68.8%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 0−1 16
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−163%
70−75
+163%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Dota 2 16−18
−113%
34
+113%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−550%
13
+550%
Fortnite 2−3
−1050%
21−24
+1050%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−171%
18−20
+171%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−200%
6
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Valorant 30−35
−68.8%
50−55
+68.8%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 15
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Dota 2 16−18
−93.8%
31
+93.8%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−500%
12
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−171%
18−20
+171%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Valorant 30−35
−213%
100−105
+213%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−1050%
21−24
+1050%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−233%
40−45
+233%
Valorant 2−3
−2000%
40−45
+2000%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Valorant 6−7
−233%
20−22
+233%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 0−1 12−14
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

Full HD
High

Grand Theft Auto V 13
+0%
13
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how Quadro K500M and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is 300% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is 2000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs performs better in 33 tests (83%)
  • there's a draw in 7 tests (18%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.14 3.91
Recency 1 June 2012 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs has a 243% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K500M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K500M is a mobile workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K500M
Quadro K500M
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K500M Quadro K500M
vs
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 Mobility FireGL V5700
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
vs
R7 M380 Radeon R7 M380
Quadro K500M Quadro K500M
vs
FirePro M8900 FirePro M8900
HD 7570M HD 7570M
vs
GTX 965M 4 GB GTX 965M 4 GB
HD 7630M HD 7630M
vs
RTX 4060 Mobile RTX 4060 Mobile
HD 7630M HD 7630M
vs
RTX 4050 Max-Q RTX 4050 Max-Q
HD 8510G HD 8510G
vs
Radeon 880M 880M
HD 8550G HD 8550G
vs
RTX 2060 Mobile RTX 2060 Mobile
GT 625M GT 625M
vs
R9 370X R9 370X
GT 625M GT 625M
vs
Pro V320 MxGPU Pro V320 MxGPU
GT 620M GT 620M
vs
R5 340 OEM R5 340 OEM
GT 620M GT 620M
vs
RTX 3060 RTX 3060
GT 525M GT 525M
vs
ATI Mobility HD 2300 Mobility HD 2300

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro K500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K500M or UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.