GeForce RTX 5060 vs Quadro K500M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K500M with GeForce RTX 5060, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K500M
2012
1 GB DDR3, 35 Watt
1.16

RTX 5060 outperforms K500M by a whopping 1600% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1045267
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.448.55
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGK107GB206
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 June 2012 (12 years ago)March 2025

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1924608
Core clock speed850 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2520 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt170 Watt
Texture fill rate13.60362.9
Floating-point processing power0.3264 TFLOPS23.22 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs16144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.4
CUDA+10.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K500M 1.16
RTX 5060 19.72
+1600%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K500M 480
RTX 5060 8125
+1593%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−443%
35−40
+443%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−6500%
65−70
+6500%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−443%
35−40
+443%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−1567%
150−160
+1567%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−700%
45−50
+700%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−6500%
65−70
+6500%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−443%
35−40
+443%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
Dota 2 1−2
−7300%
70−75
+7300%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−527%
65−70
+527%
Fortnite 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−1567%
150−160
+1567%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−900%
140−150
+900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−700%
45−50
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−857%
65−70
+857%
World of Tanks 27−30
−781%
230−240
+781%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−6500%
65−70
+6500%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−443%
35−40
+443%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
Dota 2 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−527%
65−70
+527%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−1567%
150−160
+1567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−900%
140−150
+900%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1471%
110−120
+1471%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 18−20
World of Tanks 7−8
−1943%
140−150
+1943%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1060%
55−60
+1060%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 30−35
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
Valorant 6−7
−817%
55−60
+817%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 10−12
Dota 2 14−16
−140%
35−40
+140%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1567%
250−260
+1567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−2033%
60−65
+2033%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 12−14
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−1567%
250−260
+1567%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 10−12
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Dota 2 14−16
−1567%
250−260
+1567%
Far Cry 5 0−1 27−30
Valorant 1−2
−2500%
24−27
+2500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 5060 is 7300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 5060 is ahead in 24 tests (63%)
  • there's a draw in 14 tests (37%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.16 19.72
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 170 Watt

Quadro K500M has 385.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 5060, on the other hand, has a 1600% higher aggregate performance score, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5060 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K500M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K500M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 5060 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K500M
Quadro K500M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060
GeForce RTX 5060

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro K500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 336 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.