GeForce MX570 vs Quadro K5000M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K5000M with GeForce MX570, including specs and performance data.

K5000M
2012
4 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
7.26

MX570 outperforms K5000M by a whopping 103% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking547361
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.56no data
Power efficiency5.0140.76
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGK104GA107
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date7 August 2012 (12 years ago)May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores13442048
Core clock speed601 MHz832 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1155 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate67.3173.92
Floating-point processing power1.615 TFLOPS4.731 TFLOPS
ROPs3240
TMUs11264
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed750 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA+8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

K5000M 7.26
GeForce MX570 14.77
+103%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

K5000M 2806
GeForce MX570 5712
+104%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD59
+55.3%
38
−55.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.59no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 16−18
−112%
35−40
+112%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−78.6%
24−27
+78.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−107%
27−30
+107%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 16−18
−112%
35−40
+112%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−100%
60−65
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−78.6%
24−27
+78.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−107%
27−30
+107%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−114%
45−50
+114%
Fortnite 40−45
−92.7%
75−80
+92.7%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−87.1%
55−60
+87.1%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−138%
35−40
+138%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−104%
50−55
+104%
Valorant 70−75
−58.1%
110−120
+58.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 16−18
−112%
35−40
+112%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−100%
60−65
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−78.6%
24−27
+78.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
−71.2%
190−200
+71.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−107%
27−30
+107%
Dota 2 50−55
−64.8%
85−90
+64.8%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−114%
45−50
+114%
Fortnite 40−45
−92.7%
75−80
+92.7%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−87.1%
55−60
+87.1%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−138%
35−40
+138%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−116%
54
+116%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−123%
27−30
+123%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−104%
50−55
+104%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−111%
35−40
+111%
Valorant 70−75
−58.1%
110−120
+58.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
−100%
60−65
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−78.6%
24−27
+78.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−107%
27−30
+107%
Dota 2 50−55
−64.8%
85−90
+64.8%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−114%
45−50
+114%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−87.1%
55−60
+87.1%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−138%
35−40
+138%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−104%
50−55
+104%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−88.9%
34
+88.9%
Valorant 70−75
−58.1%
110−120
+58.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
−92.7%
75−80
+92.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
−96.2%
100−110
+96.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10
−144%
21−24
+144%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−143%
16−18
+143%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−228%
120−130
+228%
Valorant 75−80
−85.9%
140−150
+85.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−200%
35−40
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−113%
30−35
+113%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−127%
24−27
+127%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−100%
21−24
+100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
−121%
30−35
+121%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−44.4%
24−27
+44.4%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−280%
18−20
+280%
Valorant 35−40
−117%
75−80
+117%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−233%
20−22
+233%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Dota 2 24−27
−100%
50−55
+100%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−114%
14−16
+114%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−118%
24−27
+118%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−85.7%
12−14
+85.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
−85.7%
12−14
+85.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how K5000M and GeForce MX570 compete in popular games:

  • K5000M is 55% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce MX570 is ahead in 66 tests (99%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.26 14.77
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 25 Watt

K5000M has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GeForce MX570, on the other hand, has a 103.4% higher aggregate performance score, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX570 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K5000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K5000M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce MX570 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
Quadro K5000M
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 87 votes

Rate Quadro K5000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 94 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K5000M or GeForce MX570, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.