GeForce MX570 vs Quadro K5000M

Place in the ranking	544	357
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.52	no data
Power efficiency	5.03	41.06
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GK104	GA107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	7 August 2012 (12 years ago)	May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$329.99	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1344	2048
Core clock speed	601 MHz	832 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1155 MHz
Number of transistors	3,540 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	67.31	73.92
Floating-point processing power	1.615 TFLOPS	4.731 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	40
TMUs	112	64
Tensor Cores	no data	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	750 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	96 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	+	1.3
CUDA	+	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K5000M 7.21

GeForce MX570 14.72
+104%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

K5000M 2806

GeForce MX570 5729
+104%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

54
+31.7%

−31.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

6.11

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −78.6%	24−27 +78.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −93.3%	27−30 +93.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −109%	45−50 +109%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −78.6%	24−27 +78.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −93.3%	27−30 +93.3%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 −103%	60−65 +103%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 −129%	35−40 +129%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −116%	40−45 +116%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −71.4%	35−40 +71.4%
Valorant	24−27 −131%	60−65 +131%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −109%	45−50 +109%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −78.6%	24−27 +78.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −93.3%	27−30 +93.3%
Dota 2	24−27 +117%	12 −117%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −113%	68 +113%
Fortnite	40−45 −93%	80−85 +93%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 −103%	60−65 +103%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 −129%	35−40 +129%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 −112%	50−55 +112%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −116%	40−45 +116%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −81.4%	100−110 +81.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −71.4%	35−40 +71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −105%	45−50 +105%
Valorant	24−27 −131%	60−65 +131%
World of Tanks	110−120 −72.3%	190−200 +72.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −109%	45−50 +109%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +7.7%	13 −7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −93.3%	27−30 +93.3%
Dota 2	24−27 −108%	50−55 +108%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −68.8%	50−55 +68.8%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 −103%	60−65 +103%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 −129%	35−40 +129%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −81.4%	100−110 +81.4%
Valorant	24−27 −131%	60−65 +131%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	8−9 −175%	21−24 +175%
Grand Theft Auto V	9−10 −144%	21−24 +144%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −254%	130−140 +254%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −117%	12−14 +117%
World of Tanks	50−55 −96.2%	100−110 +96.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −131%	30−33 +131%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −83.3%	10−12 +83.3%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −140%	35−40 +140%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −147%	35−40 +147%
Forza Horizon 5	10−12 −109%	21−24 +109%
Metro Exodus	10−12 −191%	30−35 +191%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −100%	20−22 +100%
Valorant	18−20 −94.7%	35−40 +94.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Dota 2	18−20 −44.4%	24−27 +44.4%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 −44.4%	24−27 +44.4%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 −110%	40−45 +110%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −44.4%	24−27 +44.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −133%	14−16 +133%
Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Dota 2	18−20 −44.4%	24−27 +44.4%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −111%	18−20 +111%
Fortnite	7−8 −143%	16−18 +143%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
Forza Horizon 5	5−6 −120%	10−12 +120%
Valorant	7−8 −129%	16−18 +129%

This is how K5000M and GeForce MX570 compete in popular games:

K5000M is 32% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the K5000M is 117% faster.
in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 254% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

K5000M is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
GeForce MX570 is ahead in 61 test (97%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.21	14.72
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	25 Watt

K5000M has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GeForce MX570, on the other hand, has a 104.2% higher aggregate performance score, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX570 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K5000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K5000M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce MX570 is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.