GeForce 9800M GTS SLI vs Quadro K5000M

Place in the ranking	542	901
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.30	no data
Power efficiency	5.02	0.91
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	G9x (2007−2010)
GPU code name	GK104	NB9E-GT
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	7 August 2012 (12 years ago)	15 July 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$329.99	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1344	128
Core clock speed	601 MHz	600 MHz
Number of transistors	3,540 million	1508 Million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	150 Watt
Texture fill rate	67.31	no data
Floating-point processing power	1.615 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	no data
TMUs	112	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	no data
SLI options	-	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	750 MHz	800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	10
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	+	-
CUDA	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K5000M 7.20
+269%

9800M GTS SLI 1.95

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

K5000M 20139
+256%

9800M GTS SLI 5663

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

50
+317%

12−14

−317%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

6.60

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

10−12
+175%

4−5

−175%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Battlefield 5	21−24 +2000%	1−2 −2000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +200%	5−6 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22 +300%	5−6 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +488%	8−9 −488%
Hitman 3	14−16 +100%	7−8 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +133%	18−20 −133%
Metro Exodus	20−22 +300%	5−6 −300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 +400%	4−5 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +140%	10−11 −140%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +54.3%	35−40 −54.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Battlefield 5	21−24 +2000%	1−2 −2000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +200%	5−6 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22 +300%	5−6 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +488%	8−9 −488%
Hitman 3	14−16 +100%	7−8 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +133%	18−20 −133%
Metro Exodus	20−22 +300%	5−6 −300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 +400%	4−5 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +140%	10−11 −140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +83.3%	12−14 −83.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +54.3%	35−40 −54.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +200%	5−6 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +488%	8−9 −488%
Hitman 3	14−16 +100%	7−8 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +133%	18−20 −133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +140%	10−11 −140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +83.3%	12−14 −83.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +54.3%	35−40 −54.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

20−22
+400%

4−5

−400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +271%	7−8 −271%
Hitman 3	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +150%	6−7 −150%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +318%	10−12 −318%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14
+140%

5−6

−140%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Hitman 3	3−4	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +283%	6−7 −283%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8
+133%

3−4

−133%

This is how K5000M and 9800M GTS SLI compete in popular games:

K5000M is 317% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the K5000M is 2000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, K5000M surpassed 9800M GTS SLI in all 53 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.20	1.95
Recency	7 August 2012	15 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	512 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	150 Watt

K5000M has a 269.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

The Quadro K5000M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800M GTS SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K5000M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.