GRID K520 vs Quadro K5000

Place in the ranking	491	539
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.27	0.15
Power efficiency	6.00	2.87
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	GK104	GK104
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	17 August 2012 (13 years ago)	23 July 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,499	$3,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

Quadro K5000 has 80% better value for money than GRID K520.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	1536 ×2
Core clock speed	706 MHz	745 MHz
Boost clock speed	706 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	3,540 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	122 Watt	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	90.37	95.36 ×2
Floating-point processing power	2.169 TFLOPS	2.289 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs	32	32 ×2
TMUs	128	128 ×2
L1 Cache	128 KB	128 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB ×2
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed	1350 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	172.8 GB/s	160.0 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort 1.2

No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.5 (5.1)	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	3.0

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro K5000 9.53
+13.5%

GRID K520 8.40

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K5000 3988
+13.4%

Samples: 657

GRID K520 3516
Samples: 20

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Quadro K5000 37

GRID K520 40
+8.1%