ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 vs Quadro K4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K2 K220Q K240Q K260Q K280Q K500 K520 K560Q Quadro K4200 Quadro K5000 Tesla K8 Tesla K10
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5145 5165 5430 5450 5470 5570 5650 5670 Mac Edition 5730 5750 5770 5830 5850 5850 Mac Edition 5870 5870 Crossfire

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K4200 with Mobility Radeon HD 5650, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K4200
2014, $855
4 GB GDDR5, 108 Watt
10.35
+721%

K4200 outperforms Mobility HD 5650 by a whopping 721% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro K4200 Quadro K4200
ATI Mobility HD 5650 Mobility HD 5650

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4751070
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.94no data
Power efficiency7.366.45
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGK104Madison
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date22 July 2014 (11 years ago)7 January 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$854.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1344400
Core clock speed771 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed784 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)108 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate87.819.000
Floating-point processing power2.107 TFLOPS0.36 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs11220
L1 Cache112 KB40 KB
L2 Cache512 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1350 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth172.8 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p120−130
+700%
15
−700%
Full HD130−140
+713%
16
−713%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.58no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 39
+0%
39
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how Quadro K4200 and ATI Mobility HD 5650 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro K4200 is 700% faster in 900p
  • Quadro K4200 is 713% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 47 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.35 1.26
Recency 22 July 2014 7 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 108 Watt 15 Watt

Quadro K4200 has a 721.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI Mobility HD 5650, on the other hand, has 620% lower power consumption.

The Quadro K4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5650 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K4200 is a workstation graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 5650 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Quadro K4200
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
Mobility Radeon HD 5650
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K4200 Quadro K4200
vs
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
ATI Mobility HD 5650 Mobility Radeon HD 5650
vs
HD 6550M Radeon HD 6550M
Quadro K4200 Quadro K4200
vs
Instinct MI25 Radeon Instinct MI25
Quadro K2200 NVIDIA Quadro K2200
vs
RX 550X Mobile RX 550X Mobile
Quadro K2200 NVIDIA Quadro K2200
vs
RX 6900 XT RX 6900 XT
Quadro K2200 NVIDIA Quadro K2200
vs
Iris Xe Graphics MAX Xe Graphics MAX
Quadro K2200 NVIDIA Quadro K2200
vs
T600 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile
Quadro K420 NVIDIA Quadro K420
vs
Quadro P520 Quadro P520
Quadro K4200 NVIDIA Quadro K4200
vs
UHD Graphics 770 Graphics 770
Quadro K5200 NVIDIA Quadro K5200
vs
GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
Quadro K5200 NVIDIA Quadro K5200
vs
GT 440 Mac Edition GT 440 Mac Edition
Quadro K5200 NVIDIA Quadro K5200
vs
GT 440 GT 440
Quadro K5200 NVIDIA Quadro K5200
vs
5000 SDI Quadro 5000 SDI

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 187 votes

Rate Quadro K4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 282 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K4200 or Mobility Radeon HD 5650, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.