ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 vs Quadro K4200

#ad 
Buy
GRID K2 GRID K220Q GRID K260Q GRID K280Q GRID K520 GRID K520Q Quadro 4100 Quadro K4200 Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000 Mac Edition Tesla K8 Tesla K10
VS
#ad 
Buy
Mobility Radeon HD 5650 Mobility Radeon HD 5670 Mac Edition Mobility Radeon HD 5730 Mobility Radeon HD 5750 Mobility Radeon HD 5770

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K4200 with Mobility Radeon HD 5650, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K4200
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 108 Watt
9.70
+708%

K4200 outperforms ATI Mobility HD 5650 by a whopping 708% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro K4200 Quadro K4200
ATI Mobility HD 5650 Mobility HD 5650

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4361024
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.26no data
Power efficiency7.116.33
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGK104Madison
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date22 July 2014 (10 years ago)7 January 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$854.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1344400
Core clock speed771 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed784 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)108 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate87.819.000
Floating-point processing power2.107 TFLOPS0.36 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs11220

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1350 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth172.8 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p120−130
+700%
15
−700%
Full HD120−130
+650%
16
−650%

Cost per frame, $

1080p7.12no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 39
+0%
39
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how Quadro K4200 and ATI Mobility HD 5650 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro K4200 is 700% faster in 900p
  • Quadro K4200 is 650% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 48 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.70 1.20
Recency 22 July 2014 7 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 108 Watt 15 Watt

Quadro K4200 has a 708.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI Mobility HD 5650, on the other hand, has 620% lower power consumption.

The Quadro K4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5650 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K4200 is a workstation card while Mobility Radeon HD 5650 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Quadro K4200
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
Mobility Radeon HD 5650
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K4200 Quadro K4200
vs
Tesla K20Xm Tesla K20Xm
ATI Mobility HD 5650 Mobility Radeon HD 5650
vs
GT 630M GeForce GT 630M
Quadro K4200 Quadro K4200
vs
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
GTX 770 GTX 770
vs
ATI V5800 DVI V5800 DVI
Playstation 4 Pro GPU Playstation 4 Pro GPU
vs
RTX 2070 Super Mobile RTX 2070 Super Mobile
RSX Reality Synthesizer RSX Reality Synthesizer
vs
ATI HD 4670 HD 4670
FirePro W4300 W4300
vs
GT 640 GT 640
M6000 24 GB M6000 24 GB
vs
RTX A5000 Max-Q RTX A5000 Max-Q
Quadro K5200 K5200
vs
RTX 4050 RTX 4050
Quadro K2000 K2000
vs
R5 M230 R5 M230
Tesla K20s Tesla K20s
vs
RTX 6000 Ada Generation RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Quadro K5000 K5000
vs
RTX A400 RTX A400
ATI HD 4350 PCIe x1 HD 4350 PCIe x1
vs
UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 730

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 178 votes

Rate Quadro K4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 268 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K4200 or Mobility Radeon HD 5650, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.