Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) vs Quadro K4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K2 K220Q K240Q K260Q K280Q K520 Quadro 4100 Quadro K4200 Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000 Mac Edition Tesla K8 Tesla K10
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Arc 7-Core iGPU Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 8-Core iGPU 4-Core iGPU (Arc) 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K4200 with Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), including specs and performance data.

Quadro K4200
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 108 Watt
9.79
+10.1%

K4200 outperforms Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro K4200 Quadro K4200
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking476497
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.89no data
Power efficiency7.32no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameGK104Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date22 July 2014 (11 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$854.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores13444
Core clock speed771 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed784 MHz1950 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)108 Wattno data
Texture fill rate87.81no data
Floating-point processing power2.107 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs112no data
L1 Cache112 KB768 KB
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1350 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth172.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)no data
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+-
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
+9.1%
22
−9.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p35.62no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 24
+0%
24
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 22
+0%
22
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+0%
15
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+0%
30
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+0%
16
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

This is how Quadro K4200 and Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) compete in popular games:

  • Quadro K4200 is 9% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 50 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.79 8.89
Recency 22 July 2014 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

Quadro K4200 has a 10.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro K4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K4200 is a workstation graphics card while Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Quadro K4200
Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K4200 Quadro K4200
vs
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
Quadro K4200 Quadro K4200
vs
Instinct MI25 Radeon Instinct MI25
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
vs
GTX 965M 4 GB GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB
Quadro K420 Quadro K420
vs
R7 360 896SP Radeon R7 360 896SP
Quadro K420 Quadro K420
vs
HD 6450 OEM Radeon HD 6450 OEM
Quadro K4200 Quadro K4200
vs
8600 GT Mac Edition GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition
Quadro K4200 Quadro K4200
vs
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
8800 GS Mac Edition GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
Quadro K620 Quadro K620
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
Tesla K40st Tesla K40st
vs
GeForce 9200M GeForce 9200M
GRID K520 GRID K520
vs
FX 5800 Quadro FX 5800
GRID K280Q GRID K280Q
vs
6600 AGP GeForce 6600 AGP

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 187 votes

Rate Quadro K4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K4200 or Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.