GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs Quadro K4200

Place in performance ranking	389	4
Place by popularity	not in top-100	77
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.67	21.28
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	GK104	AD103-400-A1
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	22 July 2014 (9 years ago)	31 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$854.99	$999
Current price	$311 (0.4x MSRP)	$1202 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4080 SUPER has 356% better value for money than Quadro K4200.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1344	10240
Core clock speed	771 MHz	2295 MHz
Boost clock speed	784 MHz	2550 MHz
Number of transistors	3,540 million	45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	108 Watt	320 Watt
Texture fill rate	87.81	816.0
Floating-point performance	2,107 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	241 mm	310 mm
Width	1-slot	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5400 MHz	23000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	172.8 GB/s	716.8 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	+	1.3
CUDA	3.0	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K4200 11.19

RTX 4080 SUPER 88.18
+688%

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER outperforms Quadro K4200 by 688% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro K4200 4322

RTX 4080 SUPER 34055
+688%

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER outperforms Quadro K4200 by 688% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	30−35 −747%	254 +747%
1440p	21−24 −752%	179 +752%
4K	14−16 −736%	117 +736%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −770%	235 +770%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −703%	281 +703%
Battlefield 5	30−33 −713%	240−250 +713%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −757%	120−130 +757%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −743%	110−120 +743%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −738%	200−210 +738%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −760%	344 +760%
Hitman 3	14−16 −779%	120−130 +779%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −738%	503 +738%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −739%	150−160 +739%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −786%	120−130 +786%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75−80 −719%	614 +719%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −733%	150−160 +733%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −783%	212 +783%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −690%	237 +690%
Battlefield 5	30−33 −713%	240−250 +713%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −757%	120−130 +757%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −743%	110−120 +743%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −738%	200−210 +738%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 −800%	270−280 +800%
Hitman 3	14−16 −779%	120−130 +779%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −724%	350−400 +724%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −692%	95 +692%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −786%	120−130 +786%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 −711%	568 +711%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 −742%	547 +742%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −733%	150−160 +733%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −778%	158 +778%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −771%	209 +771%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −757%	120−130 +757%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −743%	110−120 +743%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −705%	322 +705%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −750%	425 +750%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 −711%	527 +711%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 −777%	263 +777%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −706%	145 +706%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16
−786%

120−130

+786%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −690%	160−170 +690%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −700%	140−150 +700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −744%	135 +744%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −817%	165 +817%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −700%	110−120 +700%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −689%	213 +689%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −774%	306 +774%
Hitman 3	16−18 −706%	120−130 +706%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −763%	345 +763%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −714%	171 +714%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 −694%	397 +694%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −719%	221 +719%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −694%	127 +694%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18
−706%

120−130

+706%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −780%	85−90 +780%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −763%	65−70 +763%
Hitman 3	10−11 −730%	80−85 +730%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −705%	169 +705%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −744%	135 +744%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −750%	204 +750%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −700%	96 +700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −725%	99 +725%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −767%	50−55 +767%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −733%	50−55 +733%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −771%	305 +771%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −758%	206 +758%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −689%	142 +689%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 −710%	81 +710%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16
−693%

110−120

+693%

This is how Quadro K4200 and RTX 4080 SUPER compete in popular games:

RTX 4080 SUPER is 747% faster in 1080p
RTX 4080 SUPER is 752% faster in 1440p
RTX 4080 SUPER is 736% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	11.19	88.18
Recency	22 July 2014	31 January 2024
Cost	$854.99	$999
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	108 Watt	320 Watt