GeForce 405M vs Quadro K4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking475not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.93no data
Power efficiency7.36no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGK104GT218
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date22 July 2014 (11 years ago)5 January 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$854.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores134416
Core clock speed771 MHz606 MHz
Boost clock speed784 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)108 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate87.814.848
Floating-point processing power2.107 TFLOPS0.03878 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data73
ROPs324
TMUs1128
L1 Cache112 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GBUp to 512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1350 MHzUp to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth172.8 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortDisplayPort, HDMI, VGA, Dual Link DVI, Single Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 API
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA3.0+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 July 2014 5 January 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 108 Watt 14 Watt

Quadro K4200 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 405M, on the other hand, has 671.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K4200 and GeForce 405M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K4200 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 405M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Quadro K4200
NVIDIA GeForce 405M
GeForce 405M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 187 votes

Rate Quadro K4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 17 votes

Rate GeForce 405M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K4200 or GeForce 405M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.