GRID K260Q vs GeForce 405M
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 589 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.39 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 2.41 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) | Kepler (2012−2018) |
| GPU code name | GT218 | GK104 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 January 2011 (14 years ago) | 28 June 2013 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $937 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 16 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 606 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 260 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 14 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 4.848 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.03878 TFLOPS | 2.289 TFLOPS |
| Gigaflops | 73 | no data |
| ROPs | 4 | 32 |
| TMUs | 8 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 32 KB | 512 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Width | no data | IGP |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | Up to 512 MB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | Up to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | DisplayPort, HDMI, VGA, Dual Link DVI, Single Link DVI | No outputs |
| Multi monitor support | + | no data |
| HDMI | + | - |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Power management | 8.0 | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 5 January 2011 | 28 June 2013 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 14 Watt | 225 Watt |
GeForce 405M has 1507.1% lower power consumption.
GRID K260Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce 405M and GRID K260Q. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce 405M is a notebook graphics card while GRID K260Q is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
