Radeon RX 7700 XT vs Quadro K4100M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K4100M with Radeon RX 7700 XT, including specs and performance data.

K4100M
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
7.16

RX 7700 XT outperforms K4100M by a whopping 712% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking54439
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.4771.00
Power efficiency4.9916.55
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGK104Navi 32
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date23 July 2013 (11 years ago)25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 $449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7700 XT has 15006% better value for money than K4100M.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores11523456
Core clock speed706 MHz1435 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2544 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt245 Watt
Texture fill rate67.78549.5
Floating-point processing power1.627 TFLOPS35.17 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs96216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K4100M 7.16
RX 7700 XT 58.17
+712%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

K4100M 2762
RX 7700 XT 22438
+712%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

K4100M 4957
RX 7700 XT 57340
+1057%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

K4100M 19909
RX 7700 XT 126733
+537%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

K4100M 3654
RX 7700 XT 42801
+1071%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

K4100M 24685
RX 7700 XT 201871
+718%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD47
−302%
189
+302%
1440p12−14
−750%
102
+750%
4K13
−362%
60
+362%

Cost per frame, $

1080p31.892.38
1440p124.924.40
4K115.317.48

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−1655%
193
+1655%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−817%
165
+817%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−1900%
180
+1900%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−771%
180−190
+771%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−627%
100−110
+627%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−1336%
158
+1336%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−581%
100−110
+581%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−595%
130−140
+595%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−377%
220−230
+377%
Hitman 3 14−16
−743%
110−120
+743%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−421%
210−220
+421%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−665%
150−160
+665%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−470%
110−120
+470%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−863%
230−240
+863%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−172%
140−150
+172%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−1411%
272
+1411%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−1556%
149
+1556%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−771%
180−190
+771%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−627%
100−110
+627%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−1100%
132
+1100%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−581%
100−110
+581%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−595%
130−140
+595%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−377%
220−230
+377%
Hitman 3 14−16
−743%
110−120
+743%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−421%
210−220
+421%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−665%
150−160
+665%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−470%
110−120
+470%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−1292%
334
+1292%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 67
−79.1%
120−130
+79.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−172%
140−150
+172%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−572%
121
+572%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−1367%
132
+1367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−627%
100−110
+627%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−1009%
122
+1009%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−581%
100−110
+581%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−391%
231
+391%
Hitman 3 14−16
−743%
110−120
+743%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−414%
216
+414%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−1096%
287
+1096%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−664%
168
+664%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−172%
140−150
+172%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−470%
110−120
+470%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−786%
120−130
+786%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−718%
90−95
+718%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−1300%
98
+1300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−4950%
101
+4950%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−871%
65−70
+871%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2567%
80
+2567%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−738%
65−70
+738%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−980%
270−280
+980%
Hitman 3 10−12
−636%
80−85
+636%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1040%
171
+1040%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−1575%
134
+1575%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−3760%
193
+3760%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1900%
120
+1900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−409%
220−230
+409%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−717%
95−100
+717%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−983%
65−70
+983%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−980%
50−55
+980%
Hitman 3 3−4
−1533%
45−50
+1533%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−848%
210−220
+848%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−2000%
80−85
+2000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−2125%
89
+2125%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−1350%
58
+1350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−1867%
59
+1867%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1267%
40−45
+1267%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3500%
36
+3500%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−850%
35−40
+850%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−1575%
134
+1575%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−4750%
97
+4750%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−1600%
30−35
+1600%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−714%
55−60
+714%

This is how K4100M and RX 7700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7700 XT is 302% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7700 XT is 750% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7700 XT is 362% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7700 XT is 4950% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 7700 XT surpassed K4100M in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.16 58.17
Recency 23 July 2013 25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 245 Watt

K4100M has 145% lower power consumption.

RX 7700 XT, on the other hand, has a 712.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K4100M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K4100M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 7700 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
Quadro K4100M
AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
Radeon RX 7700 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 77 votes

Rate Quadro K4100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1427 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.