GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Quadro K4100M

Place in performance ranking	514	705
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.76	1.04
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	G9x (2007−2010)
GPU code name	N15E-Q3-A2	N10E-GTX
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	23 July 2013 (10 years ago)	2 March 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,499	no data
Current price	$323 (0.2x MSRP)	$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

K4100M has 69% better value for money than GTX 280M SLI.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1152	256
Core clock speed	706 MHz	585 MHz
Number of transistors	3,540 million	1508 Million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	150 Watt
Texture fill rate	67.78	no data
Floating-point performance	1,627 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro K4100M and GeForce GTX 280M SLI compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	3200 MHz	950 MHz
Memory bandwidth	102.4 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	no data
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	10
Shader Model	5	no data
OpenGL	4.5	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	+	no data
CUDA	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K4100M 7.13
+113%

GTX 280M SLI 3.34

Quadro K4100M outperforms GeForce GTX 280M SLI by 113% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

K4100M 19909
+111%

GTX 280M SLI 9435

Quadro K4100M outperforms GeForce GTX 280M SLI by 111% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	50 +138%	21−24 −138%
4K	13 +117%	6−7 −117%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

10−12

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10	no data
Battlefield 5	21−24	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12	no data
Far Cry 5	16−18	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22	no data
Forza Horizon 4	30−35	no data
Hitman 3	12−14	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35	no data
Metro Exodus	18−20	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10	no data
Battlefield 5	21−24	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12	no data
Far Cry 5	16−18	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22	no data
Forza Horizon 4	30−35	no data
Hitman 3	12−14	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35	no data
Metro Exodus	18−20	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12	no data
Far Cry 5	16−18	no data
Forza Horizon 4	30−35	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

20−22

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4	no data
Far Cry 5	10−12	no data
Forza Horizon 4	12−14	no data
Hitman 3	10−12	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16	no data
Metro Exodus	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4	no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6	no data
Hitman 3	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3−4	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	4−5	no data
Forza Horizon 4	8−9	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8	no data
Metro Exodus	8−9	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3	no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8

no data

This is how K4100M and GTX 280M SLI compete in popular games:

K4100M is 138% faster in 1080p
K4100M is 117% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.13	3.34
Recency	23 July 2013	2 March 2009
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	150 Watt