Radeon RX 6750 GRE vs Quadro K4000

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K4000 with Radeon RX 6750 GRE, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K4000
2013
3 GB GDDR5, 80 Watt
7.04

RX 6750 GRE outperforms K4000 by a whopping 585% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking54767
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.5446.22
Power efficiency6.0913.36
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGK106Navi 22
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 March 2013 (11 years ago)17 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,269 $549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6750 GRE has 8459% better value for money than Quadro K4000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682560
Core clock speed810 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2581 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate51.84413.0
Floating-point processing power1.244 TFLOPSno data
ROPs2464
TMUs64160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length241 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3 GB12 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1404 MHz18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth134.8 GB/s432.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA3.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K4000 7.04
RX 6750 GRE 48.24
+585%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K4000 2716
RX 6750 GRE 18613
+585%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.04 48.24
Recency 1 March 2013 17 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 250 Watt

Quadro K4000 has 212.5% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 GRE, on the other hand, has a 585.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K4000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6750 GRE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K4000
Quadro K4000
AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE
Radeon RX 6750 GRE

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 190 votes

Rate Quadro K4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 210 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.