Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Quadro K4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro K2000 Quadro K2200 Quadro K4000 Quadro K4200
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K4000 with Iris Xe MAX Graphics, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K4000
2013
3 GB GDDR5, 80 Watt
6.81
+38.1%

K4000 outperforms Iris Xe MAX Graphics by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro K4000 Quadro K4000
Iris Xe MAX Graphics Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking554629
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.61no data
Power efficiency6.0914.11
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameGK106DG1
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 March 2013 (11 years ago)31 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,269 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768768
Core clock speed810 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate51.8479.20
Floating-point processing power1.244 TFLOPS2.534 TFLOPS
ROPs2424
TMUs6448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount3 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1404 MHz2133 MHz
Memory bandwidth134.8 GB/s68.26 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.2
CUDA3.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K4000 6.81
+38.1%
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 4.93

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K4000 2723
+38.2%
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 1971

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
+29.6%
27
−29.6%
1440p27−30
+35%
20
−35%
4K21−24
+31.3%
16
−31.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p36.26no data
1440p47.00no data
4K60.43no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+0%
7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 39
+0%
39
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 23
+0%
23
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
+0%
33
+0%
Valorant 29
+0%
29
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+0%
6
+0%
Dota 2 27
+0%
27
+0%
Far Cry 5 29
+0%
29
+0%
Fortnite 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 33
+0%
33
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20
+0%
20
+0%
Metro Exodus 18
+0%
18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9
+0%
9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 15
+0%
15
+0%
World of Tanks 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Dota 2 38
+0%
38
+0%
Far Cry 5 42
+0%
42
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 29
+0%
29
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
World of Tanks 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20
+0%
20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 20
+0%
20
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 11
+0%
11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Valorant 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how Quadro K4000 and Iris Xe MAX Graphics compete in popular games:

  • Quadro K4000 is 30% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro K4000 is 35% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro K4000 is 31% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.81 4.93
Recency 1 March 2013 31 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 25 Watt

Quadro K4000 has a 38.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 220% lower power consumption.

The Quadro K4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe MAX Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K4000 is a workstation card while Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K4000
Quadro K4000
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K4000 Quadro K4000
vs
GRID K2 GRID K2
Iris Xe MAX Graphics Iris Xe MAX Graphics
vs
R9 M385 Radeon R9 M385
Quadro K4000 Quadro K4000
vs
Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000
vs
RTX 4070 GDDR6 GeForce RTX 4070 GDDR6
K2000D Quadro K2000D
vs
GT 220 GeForce GT 220
Quadro K4000 Quadro K4000
vs
ATI V3800 FirePro V3800
Quadro K4000 Quadro K4000
vs
ATI HD 4250 IGP Radeon HD 4250 IGP
Quadro K4000 Quadro K4000
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Quadro K600 Quadro K600
vs
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
Quadro K600 Quadro K600
vs
GRID K160Q GRID K160Q
Quadro K600 Quadro K600
vs
ATI X1600 Radeon X1600
Quadro K600 Quadro K600
vs
G210 OEM GeForce G210 OEM
Quadro K600 Quadro K600
vs
Quadro4 500 XGL Quadro4 500 XGL

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 197 votes

Rate Quadro K4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 273 votes

Rate Iris Xe MAX Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.