Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled vs Quadro K2200M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking546not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.01no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGM107Vega 10
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date19 July 2014 (11 years ago)13 July 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,489

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6404096
Core clock speed667 MHz1382 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1600 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt375 Watt
Texture fill rate26.68409.6
Floating-point processing power0.8538 TFLOPS13.11 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs40256
L1 Cache320 KB1 MB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s483.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.1.125
CUDA5.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 July 2014 13 July 2017
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 375 Watt

K2200M has 477% lower power consumption.

Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K2200M and Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K2200M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 39 votes

Rate Quadro K2200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K2200M or Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.