NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs 5000
Comparison of Quadro K2200M and Quadro 5000 architecture, market type and release date.
Quadro K2200M and Quadro 5000's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro K2200M and Quadro 5000's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Quadro K2200M and Quadro 5000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro K2200M and Quadro 5000: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro K2200M and Quadro 5000.
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro K2200M and Quadro 5000. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision Pro
nView Display Management
APIs supported by Quadro K2200M and Quadro 5000, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro K2200M and Quadro 5000. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
K2200M 15.85 +158.6%
Quadro 5000 6.13
K2200M 3790 +73.3%
Quadro 5000 2187
Rendering quality tests
GFXBench render quality
GFXBench high precision render quality
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro K2200M and Quadro 5000. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
Let's see how good Quadro K2200M and Quadro 5000 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
158.6% faster (about 2.5 times) in synthetic tests
Much newer (19 July 2014 vs 23 February 2011)
More pipelines (640 vs 352)
Finer manufacturing process technology (28 vs 40 nm)
Less power hungry (65 vs 152 watts)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro 5000
Wider memory bus (320 vs 128 bit)
Higher memory bandwidth (120 vs 80 GB/s)
So, Quadro K2200M or 5000?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro K2200M.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro K2200M and Quadro 5000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.