GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs Quadro K2200M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K1000M K1100M K2000M K2000M Embedded K2100M K2200M K3000M K3100M K4000M K4100M K5000M K5100M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
4050 Max-Q 4050 Mobile 4060 Max-Q 4060 Mobile 4060 Ti Mobile 4070 Max-Q 4070 Mobile 4080 Max-Q 4080 Mobile 4080 Ti Max-Q 4080 Ti Mobile 4090 Max-Q 4090 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K2200M with GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

K2200M
2014
2 GB GDDR5, 65 Watt
8.26

RTX 4090 Mobile outperforms K2200M by a whopping 674% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
K2200M K2200M
RTX 4090 Mobile RTX 4090 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking54233
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.8441.28
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGM107AD103
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date19 July 2014 (11 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6409728
Core clock speed667 MHz1335 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1695 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate26.68515.3
Floating-point processing power0.8538 TFLOPS32.98 TFLOPS
ROPs16112
TMUs40304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76
L1 Cache320 KB9.5 MB
L2 Cache2 MB64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA5.08.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

K2200M 8.26
RTX 4090 Mobile 63.96
+674%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

K2200M 3497
Samples: 58
RTX 4090 Mobile 27068
+674%
Samples: 2506

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
−710%
170
+710%
1440p16−18
−719%
131
+719%
4K10−12
−690%
79
+690%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 147
+0%
147
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 179
+0%
179
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 240
+0%
240
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 142
+0%
142
+0%
Far Cry 5 173
+0%
173
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 181
+0%
181
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 152
+0%
152
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 214
+0%
214
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 133
+0%
133
+0%
Dota 2 199
+0%
199
+0%
Far Cry 5 167
+0%
167
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 174
+0%
174
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 162
+0%
162
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 88
+0%
88
+0%
Metro Exodus 156
+0%
156
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 394
+0%
394
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 128
+0%
128
+0%
Dota 2 187
+0%
187
+0%
Far Cry 5 158
+0%
158
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 82
+0%
82
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 204
+0%
204
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 173
+0%
173
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 516
+0%
516
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 138
+0%
138
+0%
Metro Exodus 117
+0%
117
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 485
+0%
485
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95
+0%
95
+0%
Far Cry 5 151
+0%
151
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 74
+0%
74
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 164
+0%
164
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 88
+0%
88
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 314
+0%
314
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 172
+0%
172
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 82
+0%
82
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150
+0%
150
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 48
+0%
48
+0%
Dota 2 179
+0%
179
+0%
Far Cry 5 107
+0%
107
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 37
+0%
37
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how K2200M and RTX 4090 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 710% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 719% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 690% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.26 63.96
Recency 19 July 2014 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 120 Watt

K2200M has 84.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 4090 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 674.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2200M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K2200M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
Quadro K2200M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

K2200M Quadro K2200M
vs
T500 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile
RTX 4090 Mobile GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
vs
RTX 5080 Mobile GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile
K2200M Quadro K2200M
vs
Pro 560 Radeon Pro 560
FX 1100 FX 1100
vs
HD Graphics P4600 HD Graphics P4600
Quadro4 200 NVS Quadro4 200 NVS
vs
T400 T400
Quadro4 380 XGL Quadro4 380 XGL
vs
RTX 5090 RTX 5090
Quadro2 MXR Low Profile Quadro2 MXR Low Profile
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile
W6150M W6150M
vs
RX 5900 RX 5900
FX Go540 FX Go540
vs
RTX 5090 D V2 RTX 5090 D V2
GeForce MX150 MX150
vs
HD 7970 GHz Edition HD 7970 GHz Edition
GeForce MX150 MX150
vs
8400 GS Rev. 2 8400 GS Rev. 2
GeForce MX150 MX150
vs
RTX 4080 RTX 4080
GeForce MX150 MX150
vs
RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 39 votes

Rate Quadro K2200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 833 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K2200M or GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.