Radeon R5 M430 vs Quadro K2200

Place in performance ranking	441	892
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	2.89	0.04
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code name	GM107	Mars
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	22 July 2014 (9 years ago)	1 May 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$395.75	no data
Current price	$313 (0.8x MSRP)	$749

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro K2200 has 7125% better value for money than R5 M430.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	320
Core clock speed	1046 MHz	955 MHz
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz	1030 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	690 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	68 Watt	unknown
Texture fill rate	44.96	17.10
Floating-point performance	1,439 gflops	659.2 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Quadro K2200 and Radeon R5 M430 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	202 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	1746 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB/s	16 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

No outputs

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.2
CUDA	5.0	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K2200 9.17
+449%

R5 M430 1.67

Quadro K2200 outperforms Radeon R5 M430 by 449% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro K2200 3551
+448%

R5 M430 648

Quadro K2200 outperforms Radeon R5 M430 by 448% in Passmark.