RTX A5000 Mobile vs Quadro K2200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GRID M3-3020 GRID M10-8Q GRID M40 NVS 810 K620 K1200 K2200 Tesla M10
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A3000 Mobile A3000 Mobile 12 GB A4000 Max-Q A4000 Mobile A4500 Embedded A4500 Max-Q A4500 Mobile A5000 Max-Q A5000 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K2200 with RTX A5000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K2200
2014, $396
4 GB GDDR5, 68 Watt
8.56

RTX A5000 Mobile outperforms K2200 by a whopping 356% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
RTX A5000 Mobile RTX A5000 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking537125
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.39no data
Power efficiency9.6720.00
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGM107GA104
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date22 July 2014 (11 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$395.75 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6406144
Core clock speed1046 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHz1575 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)68 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate44.96302.4
Floating-point processing power1.439 TFLOPS19.35 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs40192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cache320 KB6 MB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length202 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.19 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA5.08.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro K2200 8.56
RTX A5000 Mobile 39.04
+356%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K2200 3581
Samples: 2620
RTX A5000 Mobile 16327
+356%
Samples: 360

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
−410%
107
+410%
1440p14−16
−393%
69
+393%
4K10−12
−390%
49
+390%

Cost per frame, $

1080p18.85no data
1440p28.27no data
4K39.58no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry 5 93
+0%
93
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Dota 2 132
+0%
132
+0%
Far Cry 5 90
+0%
90
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 122
+0%
122
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Metro Exodus 80
+0%
80
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150
+0%
150
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Dota 2 124
+0%
124
+0%
Far Cry 5 85
+0%
85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90
+0%
90
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 82
+0%
82
+0%
Metro Exodus 44
+0%
44
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 79
+0%
79
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+0%
76
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 26
+0%
26
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 58
+0%
58
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Dota 2 107
+0%
107
+0%
Far Cry 5 44
+0%
44
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

This is how Quadro K2200 and RTX A5000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A5000 Mobile is 410% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A5000 Mobile is 393% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A5000 Mobile is 390% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.56 39.04
Recency 22 July 2014 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 68 Watt 150 Watt

Quadro K2200 has 120.6% lower power consumption.

RTX A5000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 356.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A5000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K2200 is a workstation graphics card while RTX A5000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Quadro K2200
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
RTX A5000 Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
vs
T400 T400
RTX A5000 Mobile RTX A5000 Mobile
vs
RTX A4500 Mobile RTX A4500 Mobile
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
vs
GRID K520 GRID K520
Tesla K80m Tesla K80m
vs
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
Tesla K8 Tesla K8
vs
R5 M230 Rebrand R5 M230 Rebrand
Tesla K8 Tesla K8
vs
7200 GS 7200 GS
Quadro K2200 K2200
vs
Quadro 2000M 2000M
Quadro K2200 K2200
vs
HD Graphics 2500 HD Graphics 2500
Quadro K2200 K2200
vs
Arc Pro A40 Arc Pro A40
Quadro K2200 K2200
vs
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Quadro K420 K420
vs
RX 6900 XT RX 6900 XT
Quadro K420 K420
vs
T500 Mobile T500 Mobile
Quadro K4200 K4200
vs
R5 M230 Rebrand R5 M230 Rebrand

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 466 votes

Rate Quadro K2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 71 votes

Rate RTX A5000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K2200 or RTX A5000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.