NVS 810 vs Quadro K2200

Place in performance ranking	440	724
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.92	0.10
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code name	GM107	GM107
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	22 July 2014 (9 years ago)	4 November 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$395.75	no data
Current price	$313 (0.8x MSRP)	$848

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro K2200 has 2820% better value for money than NVS 810.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	512
Core clock speed	1046 MHz	902 MHz
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz	1033 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	68 Watt	68 Watt
Texture fill rate	44.96	33.06
Floating-point performance	1,439 gflops	2x 1,058 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	202 mm	198 mm
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB/s	14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

8x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.1.126
CUDA	5.0	5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K2200 9.17
+201%

NVS 810 3.05

Quadro K2200 outperforms NVS 810 by 201% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro K2200 3550
+201%

NVS 810 1179

Quadro K2200 outperforms NVS 810 by 201% in Passmark.