ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire vs Quadro K2200
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro K2200 with Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire, including specs and performance data.
K2200 outperforms ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire by an impressive 90% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 477 | 640 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.35 | no data |
Power efficiency | 9.41 | 2.80 |
Architecture | Maxwell (2014−2017) | Terascale 2 (2009−2015) |
GPU code name | GM107 | Broadway-XT |
Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 22 July 2014 (10 years ago) | 7 January 2010 (15 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $395.75 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 640 | 1600 |
Core clock speed | 1046 MHz | 700 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | 1,870 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 68 Watt | 120 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 44.96 | no data |
Floating-point processing power | 1.439 TFLOPS | no data |
ROPs | 16 | no data |
TMUs | 40 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | no data | large |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | no data |
Length | 202 mm | no data |
Width | 1-slot | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2x1 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1253 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
OpenCL | 1.2 | no data |
Vulkan | + | - |
CUDA | 5.0 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
900p | 100−110
+88.7%
| 53
−88.7%
|
Full HD | 95−100
+82.7%
| 52
−82.7%
|
Cost per frame, $
1080p | 4.17 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Elden Ring | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Valorant | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Elden Ring | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Fortnite | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Valorant | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
World of Tanks | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Valorant | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Dota 2 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Elden Ring | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
World of Tanks | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Valorant | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Dota 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Elden Ring | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 0−1 |
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Fortnite | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Valorant | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
This is how Quadro K2200 and ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire compete in popular games:
- Quadro K2200 is 89% faster in 900p
- Quadro K2200 is 83% faster in 1080p
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 9.27 | 4.87 |
Recency | 22 July 2014 | 7 January 2010 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 68 Watt | 120 Watt |
Quadro K2200 has a 90.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 76.5% lower power consumption.
The Quadro K2200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro K2200 is a workstation card while Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.