HD Graphics P530 vs Quadro K2200

Place in performance ranking	445	762
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.08	0.12
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	Gen. 9 Skylake (2015−2016)
GPU code name	GM107	Skylake GT2
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	22 July 2014 (9 years ago)	1 September 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$395.75	no data
Current price	$313 (0.8x MSRP)	$895

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro K2200 has 2467% better value for money than HD Graphics P530.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	24
Core clock speed	1046 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz	1050 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	68 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	44.96	18.40
Floating-point performance	1,439 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro K2200 and HD Graphics P530 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x1
Length	202 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1740 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	+	1.1.97
CUDA	5.0	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K2200 9.19
+231%

HD Graphics P530 2.78

Quadro K2200 outperforms HD Graphics P530 by 231% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro K2200 3550
+231%

HD Graphics P530 1074

Quadro K2200 outperforms HD Graphics P530 by 231% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

16−18

+220%

5−6
−220%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Battlefield 5	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +218%	10−12 −218%
Hitman 3	18−20 +200%	6−7 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +206%	18−20 −206%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +192%	12−14 −192%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +213%	16−18 −213%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Battlefield 5	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +218%	10−12 −218%
Hitman 3	18−20 +200%	6−7 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +206%	18−20 −206%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +192%	12−14 −192%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +213%	16−18 −213%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +218%	10−12 −218%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +206%	18−20 −206%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +192%	12−14 −192%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +213%	16−18 −213%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

+200%

7−8
−200%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Hitman 3	24−27 +200%	8−9 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

+200%

6−7
−200%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry 5	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

+200%

4−5
−200%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.19	2.78
Recency	22 July 2014	1 September 2015
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1740 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	68 Watt	15 Watt