Arc 7-Cores iGPU vs Quadro K2200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GRID M3-3020 GRID M10-8Q GRID M40 NVS 810 Quadro K620 Quadro K1200 Quadro K2200 Tesla M10
VS
Arc 7-Core iGPU Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 8-Core iGPU

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K2200 with Arc 7-Cores iGPU, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K2200
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 68 Watt
9.26

Arc 7-Cores iGPU outperforms K2200 by an impressive 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 7-Cores iGPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking482328
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.62no data
Power efficiency9.35no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameGM107Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date22 July 2014 (10 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$395.75 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6407
Core clock speed1046 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1124 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)68 Wattno data
Texture fill rate44.96no data
Floating-point processing power1.439 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length202 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1253 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth80.19 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12_2
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+-
CUDA5.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−20
−88.9%
34
+88.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p21.99no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 41
+0%
41
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+0%
32
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 32
+0%
32
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 58
+0%
58
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
+0%
27
+0%
Far Cry 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 23
+0%
23
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 31
+0%
31
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+0%
23
+0%
Far Cry 5 34
+0%
34
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 23
+0%
23
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
+0%
52
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+0%
22
+0%
Far Cry 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+0%
22
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how Quadro K2200 and Arc 7-Cores iGPU compete in popular games:

  • Arc 7-Cores iGPU is 89% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 56 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.26 17.21
Recency 22 July 2014 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

Arc 7-Cores iGPU has a 85.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc 7-Cores iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K2200 is a workstation card while Arc 7-Cores iGPU is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Quadro K2200
Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU
Arc 7-Cores iGPU
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
vs
GRID M6-8Q GRID M6 8Q
Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 7 Cores iGPU
vs
GTX 965M SLI GeForce GTX 965M SLI
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
vs
T400 T400
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
RX 7700 XT RX 7700 XT
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
vs
ATI X550 Radeon X550
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
vs
7100 GS GeForce 7100 GS
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
vs
7950 GX2 GeForce 7950 GX2
Quadro K2200 Quadro K2200
vs
Radeon 550X Radeon 550X
Tesla K40s Tesla K40s
vs
RTX 2060 RTX 2060
Tesla K40c Tesla K40c
vs
RTX 2060 Super RTX 2060 Super
GRID K520 GRID K520
vs
Quadro P400 Quadro P400
Quadro K6000 Quadro K6000
vs
M2000M Quadro M2000M
Quadro K6000 Quadro K6000
vs
Apple M1 7-Core GPU 7 Core GPU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 430 votes

Rate Quadro K2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 57 votes

Rate Arc 7-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K2200 or Arc 7-Cores iGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.