Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB vs Quadro K2100M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking786not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.63no data
Power efficiency4.56no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameGK106Navi 31
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date23 July 2013 (12 years ago)13 April 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$84.95 $2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5764480
Core clock speed667 MHz1895 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2525 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt281 Watt
Texture fill rate32.02707.0
Floating-point processing power0.7684 TFLOPS45.25 TFLOPS
ROPs16128
TMUs48280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70
L0 Cacheno data2.2 MB
L1 Cache48 KB2 MB
L2 Cache256 KB6 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data280 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB48 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed752 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth48.0 GB/s864.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 July 2013 13 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 281 Watt

K2100M has 410.9% lower power consumption.

PRO W7800 48 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K2100M and Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K2100M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Quadro K2100M
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB
Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 296 votes

Rate Quadro K2100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 5 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K2100M or Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.