Mobility Radeon HD 5730 vs Quadro K2100M

Place in performance ranking	695	965
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.63	no data
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	GK106	Madison
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	23 July 2013 (11 years ago)	7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$84.95	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	576	400
Core clock speed	667 MHz	650 MHz
Number of transistors	2,540 million	627 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	26 Watt
Texture fill rate	32.02	13.00
Floating-point performance	768.4 gflops	520.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro K2100M and Mobility Radeon HD 5730 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3, GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	3000 MHz	800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	48.13 GB/s	25.6 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	N/A
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K2100M 3.52
+151%

ATI Mobility HD 5730 1.40

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

K2100M 10648
+180%

ATI Mobility HD 5730 3809

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	35−40 +150%	14 −150%
Full HD	25 +47.1%	17 −47.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

6−7
+50%

4−5

−50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3	0−1
Battlefield 5	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Hitman 3	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +66.7%	14−16 −66.7%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 +75%	8−9 −75%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +24.2%	30−35 −24.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3	0−1
Battlefield 5	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Hitman 3	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +66.7%	14−16 −66.7%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 +75%	8−9 −75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	25 +127%	10−12 −127%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +24.2%	30−35 −24.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Hitman 3	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +66.7%	14−16 −66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 +75%	8−9 −75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +36.4%	10−12 −36.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 +24.2%	30−35 −24.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10
+350%

2−3

−350%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2	0−1
Hitman 3	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +214%	7−8 −214%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8
+75%

4−5

−75%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	1−2	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5
+33.3%

3−4

−33.3%

This is how K2100M and ATI Mobility HD 5730 compete in popular games:

K2100M is 150% faster in 900p
K2100M is 47% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the K2100M is 567% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

K2100M is ahead in 48 tests (98%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.52	1.40
Recency	23 July 2013	7 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	26 Watt

K2100M has a 151.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI Mobility HD 5730, on the other hand, has 111.5% lower power consumption.

The Quadro K2100M is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5730 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K2100M is a mobile workstation card while Mobility Radeon HD 5730 is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.