ATI Radeon X300 SE vs Quadro K2000D
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 748 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.18 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 5.74 | no data |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Rage 9 (2003−2006) |
| GPU code name | GK107 | RV370 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 March 2013 (12 years ago) | 1 September 2004 (21 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 325 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,270 million | 107 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 110 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 51 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 1.300 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.7327 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 16 | 4 |
| TMUs | 32 | 4 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 202 mm | no data |
| Width | 1-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 64 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 3.2 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 9.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | N/A |
| Vulkan | + | N/A |
| CUDA | 3.0 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 March 2013 | 1 September 2004 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 64 MB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 110 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 51 Watt | 30 Watt |
K2000D has an age advantage of 8 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.
ATI X300 SE, on the other hand, has 70% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Quadro K2000D and Radeon X300 SE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro K2000D is a workstation graphics card while Radeon X300 SE is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
